Operative Versus Non Operative Treatment for Unstable Ankle Fractures

Study Description

Go to 

Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Brief Summary:

The purpose of the study is to compare functional outcomes and recovery following surgical and non surgical treatment of potentially unstable , isolated fibula fractures. Secondary objectives are to compare the re-operation rate, time to union and complications between the two treatment groups.

The primary research questions:

1. Does surgery provide a better functional outcome compared to non operative treatment of undisplaced, unstable fractures?
2. Do patients with these fractures return to activities faster after operative or non operative treatment?
3. Are complications more common with operative or non operative care?

Condition or disease	Intervention/treatment	Phase
Ankle Injuries	Procedure: non operative treatment; Procedure: operative treatment of ankle fractures	Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

The most controversial ankle fracture is the Weber B fracture in which the fibular (or lateral malleolar) fracture begins at the level of the ankle mortise and extends proximal and lateral. This fracture can exist as isolated fractures of the lateral malleolus, or bimalleolar injuries in which both lateral and medial malleoli are fractured. When both malleoli are fractured, the ankle has lost all of its bony support and is unstable. In contrast, if only the lateral malleolus is injured, the Weber B injury may be either stable or unstable. When the ankle is subluxed or dislocated in these injuries, the ankle is clearly unstable. However, when the ankle is not initially subluxed, the assessment of stability is more difficult. Stability in isolated lateral malleolar fractures depends upon the status of the medial, or deltoid, ligaments. Further complicating matters, the deltoid ligament may be intact, partially torn, or completely torn such that there is a spectrum of stability for these injuries.Previous studies relied upon an assessment of tenderness over the ligament to determine instability, but this may not differentiate between partial and complete tears.

In North America, most surgeons would agree that markedly unstable definitely unstable ankle fractures are best treated surgically.Therefore, Weber B fractures which involve fractures of both the medial and lateral malleolus are best treated by surgical stabilization. Furthermore, Weber B fractures involving only the lateral malleolus, but which present with lateral subluxation of the talus, are definitely unstable and require fixation.

In contrast, controversy exists between surgeons regarding the optimal means of treating an undisplaced but potentially unstable fibula fracture. Many surgeons recommend routine operative fixation, while others recommend routine non-operative treatment.A clear rationale exists for both types of treatment.

The most important factor in treatment includes maintaining the reduction of the talus within the ankle mortise. Even 1 mm of displacement or lateral shift of the talus will affect ankle joint loading and lead to dysfunction and potentially arthritis. Other issues include the potential benefits of earlier mobilization and rehabilitation.

Study Design

Go to 

Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Study Type :	Interventional (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment :	80 participants
Allocation:	Randomized
Intervention Model:	Parallel Assignment
Masking:	None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:	Treatment
Official Title:	A Prospective Randomized Multi-Centre Study to Compare Operative Versus Non Operative Functional Treatment in Patients With Unstable Isolated Fibula Fractures
Study Start Date :	June 2003
Actual Primary Completion Date :	August 2010
Actual Study Completion Date :	August 2010

Arms and Interventions

Go to 

Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Arm	Intervention/treatment
Active Comparator: 1; Non operative treatment of Weber B ankle fracture. Use of cast, with no surgical intervention	Procedure: non operative treatment; non operative treatment -casting for 6 weeks
Active Comparator: 2; Operative treatment of Weber B ankle fracture. Open reduction and internal fixation to repair a broken bones.	Procedure: operative treatment of ankle fractures; operative treatment of ankle fractures

Outcome Measures

Go to 

Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Primary Outcome Measures :

1. Primary outcome: comparison of physical functioning score on SF36 [ Time Frame: enrolment, 6 weeks, 3,6 12 months ]

Secondary Outcome Measures :

1. Secondary objectives are to compare the re-operation rate between operative and non-operative treatment and to compare the time to union, rates of nonunion and complications such as infection between the two groups. [ Time Frame: enrolment, 6 weeks, 3,6,12 months ]
   Number of participants with complications or adverse events that ae related to treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Go to 

Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Ages Eligible for Study:	18 Years to 65 Years (Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:	All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:	No

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Skeletally mature male or female < 65 years of age
2. Unstable ankle on stress exam: medial clear space ³ 5 mm: no Mortise shift on static radiographs
3. Unilateral Weber B fibular fractures
4. Closed fracture
5. Provision of informed consent -

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Fractures not amenable to surgical treatment
2. Pathologic fracture
3. Associated injuries to the foot, ankle, tibia, or knee
4. Associated medial malleolus fracture
5. Surgical delay of >2 weeks from time of injury
6. Previous fracture or retained hardware in the affected limb
7. Associated neurovascular injury or deficit in the affected limb
8. Systemic diseases including diabetes, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, and other disorders which might affect peripheral sensorimotor function -

Contacts and Locations

Go to 

Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Locations

Canada, Ontario
LOndon Health Sciences cEntre- Victoria Hospital
LOndon, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4G5

Sponsors and Collaborators

Lawson Health Research Institute

Investigators

Principal Investigator:	DR. David Sanders, M.D., FRCSC	University of Western Ontario, Canada

More Information

Go to 

Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Responsible Party:	David Sanders, Surgeon, Lawson Health Research Institute
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:	NCT00336752 History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers:	R-03-113; HSREB09641 ( Other Identifier: Western University Research Ethics )
First Posted:	June 14, 2006
Last Update Posted:	September 7, 2016
Last Verified:	September 2016
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD:	No

Keywords provided by David Sanders, Lawson Health Research Institute:

undisplaced ,unstable wEBER B ankle fractures; operative intervention; non operative intervention

Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Ankle Fractures; Ankle Injuries; Fractures, Bone; Wounds and Injuries; Leg Injuries