Comparison of an Easy to Read Advance Directive Versus a Standard Advance Directive
Behavioral: AD-Easy (Advance Directive-Easy)
Behavioral: AD-Standard (Advance Directive-Standard)
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: Single Blind
|Official Title:||Effects of an Easy to Read Advance Directive on Acceptability, Knowledge, and Self-efficacy Compared to a Standard Advance Directive|
- attitudes about the forms utility
- 6 month outcomes included whether participant talked with their doctor about treatment wishes, talked to family, thought about treatment decisions, or filled out an advance directive
|Study Start Date:||August 2004|
|Estimated Study Completion Date:||July 2005|
Advance directives are forms that allow patients to document their medical treatment preferences and to designate another person to help make medical decisions if they were to become too sick to make their own decisions. Most patients, even seriously ill older adults, do not fill out advance directive forms. Since the mean reading level in the US is at the 8th grade level (5th grade for elders) and since most advance directive documents are written beyond a 12th grade reading level, many patients may not be able to read, much less complete, the standard advance directive forms.
This study hypothesized that an advance directive form written at a 5th grade reading level (AD-Easy) that included culturally appropriate graphics explaining the text, and also included questions concerning patients' values, would be preferred over the standard advance directive form being used in California (AD-Standard).
The participant's literacy level and baseline knowledge of advance directive topics were assessed. Participants were then stratified by literacy level to be randomized to first attempt to read and complete either the AD-Easy or the AD-Standard. Then the participant's acceptance of the forms, self-efficacy or confidence with treatment decisions, attitudes about the form's utility, and post form review comprehension were assessed. Participants then crossed over to review the alternate form and were asked to state which form they preferred to take home. Six months later participants were called and asked if they had thought about their medical treatment preferences, spoken to their family, friends, or doctor about their treatment preferences, or if they filled out the advance directive form.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00328055
|United States, California|
|San Francisco General Hospital|
|San Francisco, California, United States, 94110|
|Principal Investigator:||Rebecca Sudore, MD||University of California, San Francisco|