Study Comparing Outcomes for Patients With Treatment Resistant Depression Who Receive VNS Therapy at Different Doses

This study has been completed.

Sponsor:

Information provided by (Responsible Party):

Cyberonics, Inc.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:

NCT00305565

First received: March 20, 2006

Last updated: December 6, 2013

Last verified: December 2013

History of Changes

Purpose

This is a postmarket medical device study. The objective of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy administered at different amounts of electrical charge for the treatment of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD).

Condition	Intervention	Phase
Depression	Device: VNS Therapy	Phase 4


Study Type:	Interventional
Study Design:	Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title:	Randomized Comparison of Outcomes in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Who Receive VNS Therapy Administered at Different Amounts of Electrical Charge

Further study details as provided by Cyberonics, Inc.:

Primary Outcome Measures:

Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Mean Change From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From Baseline to Study Week 22 ]
The 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C/SR) (Rush et al. 1986, 1996) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 84. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

Secondary Outcome Measures:

Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Percent Responders From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 22 ]
The 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C/SR) (Rush et al. 1986, 1996) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 84. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The IDS-C percent of responders at week 22. Response was defined as greater than or equal to 50% improvement from baseline.
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Percent Remitters From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 22 ]
The 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C/SR) (Rush et al. 1986, 1996) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 84. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The IDS-C percent of remitters at week 22. Remission was defined as a score of less than or equal to 14 on the IDS-C.
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Percent Responders From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 50 ]
The 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C/SR) (Rush et al. 1986, 1996) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 84. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The IDS-C percent of responders at week 50. Response was defined as greater than or equal to 50% improvement from baseline.
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Percent Sustained Responders at Study Week 50 (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 50 ]
The 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C/SR) (Rush et al. 1986, 1996) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 84. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

Sustained Response is defined as the percentage of Acute Phase responders (week 22) who were also responders at the end of the Long-term (week 50) phase. An analysis of sustained response was performed using the IDS-C to evaluate the long-term durability of the improvements in depression scores observed with adjunctive VNS Therapy.
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Percent Remitters From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 50 ]
The 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C/SR) (Rush et al. 1986, 1996) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 84. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The IDS-C percent of remitters at week 50. Remission was defined as a score of less than or equal to 14 on the IDS-C.
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (QIDS-C) Percent Responders From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 22 ]
The 16-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 27. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The QIDS-C percent of responders at week 22. Response was defined as greater than or equal to 50% improvement from baseline.
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (QIDS-C) Percent Remitters From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 22 ]
The 16-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 27. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The QIDS-C percent of remitters at week 22. Remission was defined as a score of less than or equal to 5 on the QIDS-C.
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (QIDS-C) Percent Responders From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 50 ]
The 16-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 27. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The QIDS-C percent of responders at week 50. Response was defined as greater than or equal to 50% improvement from baseline.
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (QIDS-C) Percent Remitters From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 50 ]
The 16-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 27. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The QIDS-C percent of remitters at week 50. Remission was defined as a score of less than or equal to 5 on the QIDS-C.
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Percent Responders From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 22 ]
The 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Scale (Montgomery and Asberg 1979) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 60. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The MADRS percent of responders at week 22. Response was defined as greater than or equal to 50% improvement from baseline.
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Percent Remitters From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 22 ]
The 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Scale (Montgomery and Asberg 1979) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 60. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The MADRS percent of remitters at week 22. Remission was defined as a score of less than or equal to 9 on the MADRS.
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Percent Responders From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 50 ]
The 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Scale (Montgomery and Asberg 1979) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 60. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The MADRS percent of responders at week 50. Response was defined as greater than or equal to 50% improvement from baseline.
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Percent Sustained Responders at Study Week 50 (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From Baseline to Study Week 50 ]
The 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Scale (Montgomery and Asberg 1979) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 60. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

Sustained Response is defined as the percentage of Acute Phase responders (week 22) who were also responders at the end of the Long-term (week 50) phase. An analysis of sustained response was performed using the MADRS to evaluate the long-term durability of the improvements in depression scores observed with adjunctive VNS Therapy.
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Percent Remitters From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 50 ]
The 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Scale (Montgomery and Asberg 1979) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 60. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The MADRS percent of remitters at week 50. Remission was defined as a score of less than or equal to 9 on the MADRS.
Clinical Global Impressions Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Percent Response at Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population) [ Time Frame: At Study Week 22 ]
Originally, the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) (Guy W 1976)was designed as a 7-item scale used to assess how much the patient's illness had improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention.(1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse.)

In this study, the CGI-I was categorized into just two groups. A value of 1 (considered a response) was assigned for very much improved (at least 85% improvement) & much improved (at least 60% improvement). A value of 0 (considered non-response) was assigned for: minimally improved (at least 20-25% improvement), no change (between ±15% change), minimally worse (at least 20-55% worse), much worse (at least 60% worse), and very much worse (at least 80% worse). No score was assigned if the investigator did not provide a categorical rating at a particular follow-up visit.
Clinical Global Impressions Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Percent Response at Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: At Study Week 50 ]
Originally, the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) (Guy W 1976)was designed as a 7-item scale used to assess how much the patient's illness had improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention.(1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse.)

In this study, the CGI-I was categorized into just two groups. A value of 1 (considered a response) was assigned for very much improved (at least 85% improvement) & much improved (at least 60% improvement). A value of 0 (considered non-response) was assigned for: minimally improved (at least 20-25% improvement), no change (between ±15% change), minimally worse (at least 20-55% worse), much worse (at least 60% worse), and very much worse (at least 80% worse). No score was assigned if the investigator did not provide a categorical rating at a particular follow-up visit.
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) Percent Responders From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 22 ]
The 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C/SR) (Rush et al. 1986, 1996) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 84. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The IDS-SR percent of responders at week 22. Response was defined as greater than or equal to 50% improvement from baseline.
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) Percent Remitters From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 22 ]
The 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C/SR) (Rush et al. 1986, 1996) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 84. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The IDS-SR percent of remitters at week 22. Remission was defined as a score of less than or equal to 14 on the IDS-C.
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) Percent Responders From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 50 ]
The 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C/SR) (Rush et al. 1986, 1996) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 84. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The IDS-SR percent of responders at week 50. Response was defined as greater than or equal to 50% improvement from baseline.
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) Percent Remitters From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 50 ]
The 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C/SR) (Rush et al. 1986, 1996) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 84. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The IDS-SR percent of remitters at week 50. Remission was defined as a score of less than or equal to 14 on the IDS-C.
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 22 ]
The 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C/SR) (Rush et al. 1986, 1996) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 84. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The IDS-C mean percent change at week 22
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Mean Change From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 50 ]
The 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C/SR) (Rush et al. 1986, 1996) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 84. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The IDS-C mean change at week 50
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 50 ]
The 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C/SR) (Rush et al. 1986, 1996) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 84. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The IDS-C mean percent change at week 50
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (QIDS-C) Mean Change From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 22 ]
The 16-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 27. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The QIDS-C mean change at week 22
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (QIDS-C) Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 22 ]
The 16-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 27. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The QIDS-C mean percent change at week 22
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (QIDS-C) Mean Change From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 50 ]
The 16-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 27. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The QIDS-C mean change at week 50
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (QIDS-C) Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 50 ]
The 16-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 27. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The QIDS-C mean percent change at week 50
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Mean Change From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 22 ]
The 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Scale (Montgomery and Asberg 1979) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 60. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The MADRS mean change at week 22
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 22 ]
The 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Scale (Montgomery and Asberg 1979) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 60. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The MADRS mean percent change at week 22
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Mean Change From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 50 ]
The 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Scale (Montgomery and Asberg 1979) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 60. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The MADRS mean change at week 50
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 50 ]
The 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Scale (Montgomery and Asberg 1979) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 60. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The MADRS mean percent change at week 50
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) Mean Change From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 22 ]
The 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C/SR) (Rush et al. 1986, 1996) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 84. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The IDS-SR mean change at week 22
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 22 ]
The 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C/SR) (Rush et al. 1986, 1996) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 84. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The IDS-SR mean percent change at week 22
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) Mean Change From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 50 ]
The 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C/SR) (Rush et al. 1986, 1996) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 84. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The IDS-SR mean change at week 50
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). [ Time Frame: From baseline to Study Week 50 ]
The 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C/SR) (Rush et al. 1986, 1996) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 84. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.

The IDS-SR mean percent change at week 50


Enrollment:	331
Study Start Date:	January 2006
Study Completion Date:	February 2010
Primary Completion Date:	February 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Arms	Assigned Interventions
Low Dose	Device: VNS Therapy Received output current of 0.25 milliamps (mA) Other Name: VNS Therapy System
Medium Dose	Device: VNS Therapy Received output current of 0.5-1.0 mA Other Name: VNS Therapy System
High Dose	Device: VNS Therapy Received output current of 1.0-1.5 mA Other Name: VNS Therapy System

Detailed Description:

This is a postmarket medical device study. This study will examine treatment outcomes for patients with TRD who are randomized to VNS Therapy administered at different amounts of electrical charge. The Sponsor, Cyberonics, provides funding for this study. Patients are followed for 54 weeks, 50 of those weeks are following implantation of the VNS Therapy system. No study sites will be permitted to enroll study subjects until Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval has been received. Sites are permitted to be approved by a local or a central IRB.

Eligibility


Ages Eligible for Study:	18 Years and older (Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:	All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:	No

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Patient has a diagnosis of chronic or recurrent depression and is currently experiencing a major depressive episode.
Patient has not had an adequate response to four or more adequate antidepressant treatments from at least two different antidepressant treatment categories.
Patient has (in the investigator's judgment) sufficient impairment from his/her depression and/or depression treatment that the potential benefits/risks of VNS Therapy are warranted.
Patient must currently be receiving at least one antidepressant treatment; the patient must be receiving all current antidepressant treatments in a stable regimen.
If the patient has a current diagnosis of bipolar disorder, the patient must be receiving a mood stabilizer.
Patient must be 18 years of age or older and of legal age of consent.
Patient must be able to complete the evaluations specified in the study procedures flow chart.
Patient must provide written informed consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient has had a bilateral or left cervical vagotomy.
Patient currently uses, or is expected to use during the study, short-wave diathermy, microwave diathermy, or therapeutic ultrasound diathermy.
A VNS Therapy System implant would pose an unacceptable surgical or medical risk for the patient.
Patient is expected to require full body magnetic resonance imaging during the clinical study.
Patient is acutely suicidal.
Patient has a history of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or other psychotic disorder or a current major depressive episode that includes psychotic features (commonly referred to as psychotic depression).
Patient has a history of rapid cycling bipolar disorder or a current diagnosis of bipolar disorder mixed phase.
Patient has a history of borderline personality disorder.
Patient has a history of drug or alcohol dependence within the 12 months prior to the baseline visit or currently takes a narcotic drug five or more days per week.
Patient is currently enrolled in another investigational study.
Patient has had a prior VNS Therapy System implant.

Note: Some IRBs may require additional conditions for enrollment.

Contacts and Locations

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00305565

Show 26 Study Locations

Sponsors and Collaborators

Cyberonics, Inc.

Investigators


Study Director:	Mark Bunker, PharmD	Cyberonics, Inc.

More Information

Publications:

Aaronson ST, Carpenter LL, Conway CR, Reimherr FW, Lisanby SH, Schwartz TL, Moreno FA, Dunner DL, Lesem MD, Thompson PM, Husain M, Vine CJ, Banov MD, Bernstein LP, Lehman RB, Brannon GE, Keepers GA, O'Reardon JP, Rudolph RL, Bunker M. Vagus nerve stimulation therapy randomized to different amounts of electrical charge for treatment-resistant depression: acute and chronic effects. Brain Stimul. 2013 Jul;6(4):631-40. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.09.013. Epub 2012 Oct 23.

Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Koretz D, Merikangas KR, Rush AJ, Walters EE, Wang PS; National Comorbidity Survey Replication. The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). JAMA. 2003 Jun 18;289(23):3095-105.

Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Evidence-based health policy--lessons from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Science. 1996 Nov 1;274(5288):740-3.

Geddes LA, Baker LE: Principles of Applied Biomedical Instrumentation, third edition. New York; John Wiley & Sons, 1989; 458-461.

Rush AJ, Sackeim HA, Marangell LB, George MS, Brannan SK, Davis SM, Lavori P, Howland R, Kling MA, Rittberg B, Carpenter L, Ninan P, Moreno F, Schwartz T, Conway C, Burke M, Barry JJ. Effects of 12 months of vagus nerve stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: a naturalistic study. Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Sep 1;58(5):355-63.

George MS, Rush AJ, Marangell LB, Sackeim HA, Brannan SK, Davis SM, Howland R, Kling MA, Moreno F, Rittberg B, Dunner D, Schwartz T, Carpenter L, Burke M, Ninan P, Goodnick P. A one-year comparison of vagus nerve stimulation with treatment as usual for treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Sep 1;58(5):364-73.

Rush AJ, Marangell LB, Sackeim HA, George MS, Brannan SK, Davis SM, Howland R, Kling MA, Rittberg BR, Burke WJ, Rapaport MH, Zajecka J, Nierenberg AA, Husain MM, Ginsberg D, Cooke RG. Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized, controlled acute phase trial. Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Sep 1;58(5):347-54.


Responsible Party:	Cyberonics, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:	NCT00305565 History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers:	D-21-US
Study First Received:	March 20, 2006
Results First Received:	January 6, 2011
Last Updated:	December 6, 2013

Keywords provided by Cyberonics, Inc.:


Depression Chronic Depression Bipolar Disorder

Additional relevant MeSH terms:


Depression Depressive Disorder Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant	Behavioral Symptoms Mood Disorders Mental Disorders

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on August 17, 2017

To Top