Comparison of Colonoscopy and Sigmoidoscopy in Terms of Pain, Acceptance and Procedure Time
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00302679|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified February 2006 by National Taiwan University Hospital.
Recruitment status was: Recruiting
First Posted : March 14, 2006
Last Update Posted : March 14, 2006
According to experience in a self-payed health check-up center,unsedated total colonoscopy is not inferior or may be better than unsedated sigmoidoscopy in terms of pain and patients' acceptance.
Hypothesis: Unsedated total colonoscopy is not inferior to unsedated sigmoidoscopy in terms of pain and patients' acceptance.
|Condition or disease|
|Study Type :||Observational|
|Enrollment :||400 participants|
|Observational Model:||Defined Population|
|Official Title:||Comparison of Colonoscopy and Sigmoidoscopy in Terms of Pain, Acceptance and Procedure Time|
|Study Start Date :||January 2006|
|Study Completion Date :||June 2006|
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00302679
|Contact: Wei Chih Liao, MD||886-2-23123456 ext email@example.com|
|National Taiwan University Hospital||Recruiting|
|Taipei, Taiwan, 100|
|Principal Investigator:||Wei Chih Liao, MD||National Taiwan University Hospital|