This site became the new on June 19th. Learn more.
Show more Menu IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more... Menu IMPORTANT: Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more... Menu
Give us feedback

A Clinical Study of the Use of Brushite as Primary Stabilizer in Immediate Dental Implantation

This study has suspended participant recruitment.
(manufacturer could not finance the study)
Information provided by:
Hadassah Medical Organization Identifier:
First received: March 5, 2006
Last updated: January 5, 2010
Last verified: December 2007

Objective: The evaluation of "PD" VitalOs Cement, an injectable brushite, as a stabilizer of dental implants and a potential source for bone augmentation.

Methods: Forty (40) patients needing dental implants will be treated where needed with "PD" VitalOs Cement gapping half of their sites whereas the other half will be gapped with Bio-oss demineralized bone and BioGuide membrane.

Condition Intervention Phase
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Dental Implants Procedure: using "PD" VitalOs Cement with dental implants Phase 2

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Phase 2 Clinical Study on the Efficacy of Injectable Brushite Bone Cement in Bone Augmentation and Dental Implant Stabilization

Further study details as provided by Hadassah Medical Organization:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • X-ray evaluation of osseointegration [ Time Frame: 3-6 12 months ]
  • clinical assesment [ Time Frame: 3-6 and12 ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • long-term follow-up for osseointegration: clinical and X-ray [ Time Frame: 12-18-24 months ]

Estimated Enrollment: 40
Study Start Date: December 2007
Estimated Study Completion Date: November 2008
Primary Completion Date: May 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Intervention Details:
    Procedure: using "PD" VitalOs Cement with dental implants
    supporting dental implants with Vitalos bone cement
Detailed Description:

Bone fractures or bone loss in specific sites are cases where a bone graft is sometimes needed to provide bone augmentation. For bone fractures, these are typically metaphyseal or maxillofacial fractures with risk of malunion or non-union. Bone loss can happen under various circumstances: it can be a consequence of a systemic disease like osteoporosis or of a surgical intervention like the extraction of a tooth or the removal of a bone cyst or tumor.

When a bone graft is required the gold standard still widely used is autogenous cancellous bone. However, the graft harvesting procedure is invasive and increases patient morbidity (lengthened surgical procedure, increased risk of infection). Moreover, the availability of autologous grafts is limited, especially in elderly patients. This has been the rationale for studying alternative sources for bone grafts.

The first alternative is allografts: they are usually obtained from cadavers. The advantages include elimination of a patient donor site, hence reduced surgical time and decreased blood loss and risk of infection. The principal shortcomings are the availability, the possible rejection of the graft and the risk of disease transmission.

Grafts of animal origin (xenografts) are also an option, even though not totally risk-free when it comes to disease transmission.

A third alternative to autologous bone is to use synthetic materials. Extensive research has been performed to develop such materials since the 80's. The majority of them are based on calcium phosphate compounds, made up of the same ions as those of the natural mineral phase of bone. These products are readily available, eliminate the risk of disease transmission or immunogenic response (allografts) and bypass the need for an additional surgical procedure (autografts). These materials are presented under either of the three forms: granules, pre-formed blocks or cements.

Granules and pre-formed blocks are generally made up of β-TCP, Hydroxyapatite (HA), or a mix of both. Depending mainly on their chemical composition, their manufacturing process and their porosity, they degrade more or less rapidly.

Calcium phosphate cements consist generally of a liquid and a powder which harden upon mixing. The final product phase can be hydroxyapatite, or another calcium phosphate phase like dahllite or brushite. The advantage of cements over pre-formed blocks is that they can be injected, shaped and hardened in situ, ensuring optimum bone-implant contact and minimally invasive surgery. Once hardened, they exhibit cohesive properties that granules cannot provide. Most of the calcium phosphate cements available on the market are hydroxyapatite cements. However, for some applications like periodontitis or peri-implant gap filling, their resorption rate is too slow, hampering their clinical applicability for these indications. The advantage of the brushite phase in the hardened cement is that it degrades faster than hydroxyapatite, allowing a more rapid bone regeneration. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of "PD" VitalOs Cement as a primary stabilizer and bone augmenting source in dental implantology.


Ages Eligible for Study:   Child, Adult, Senior
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Partially or fully edentulous patients who need dental implants to support a prosthesis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with uncontrolled diabetes
  • Chemotherapy
  • Immune suppressed
  • Radiotherapy to head and neck in the last five years
  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its identifier: NCT00299585

Hadassah Medical Organization,
Jerusalem,, Israel, 91120
Sponsors and Collaborators
Hadassah Medical Organization
Study Chair: Michael M Perez Davidi, DMD Hadassah Medical Organization
Principal Investigator: Nardi Caspi, DMD Hadassah Medical Organization
  More Information

Responsible Party: Arik Tzukert, DMD, Hadassah Medical Organization Identifier: NCT00299585     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 191059 HMO-CTIL
Study First Received: March 5, 2006
Last Updated: January 5, 2010

Keywords provided by Hadassah Medical Organization:
dental implant
dental implantation
bone cement
calcium phosphate
bone augmentation
primary stability
immediate implantation
Mandibular Ridge Augmentation
Maxillary Ridge Augmentation
synthetic implants for rebuilding the alveolar ridge processed this record on September 21, 2017