Treatment of Fecal Incontinence and Constipation in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The study aims to compare a newly developed system for transanal colonic irrigation (Peristeen Anal Irrigation) with a bowel management regime that does not include irrigation in a prospective, randomized trial in spinal cord lesion patients (SCL- patients) with faecal incontinence and/or constipation.
Population; 80 SCL- patients with faecal incontinence and/or constipation from five countries.
Focus on:
Bowel symptom score Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction score Symptom related quality of life questionnaire Time expenditure for performance of bowel care ans side effects
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Constipation Fecal Incontinence Spinal Cord Injury |
Procedure: Transanal irrigation with Peristeen Anal Irrigation |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Treatment of Fecal Incontinence and Constipation in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury - a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multicentre Trial of Transanal Irrigation Vs. Conservative Bowel Management |
- Cleveland Clinic Constipaton Scoring System
- St. Mark's Fecal Incontinence Grading System
- Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score
- American Society of Colorectal Surgeon Fecal Incontinence Score
| Estimated Enrollment: | 80 |
| Study Start Date: | December 2003 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | August 2005 |
The magnitude of bowel dysfunction in spinal cord injury patients has been documented in several studies. Spinal cord injury affects colorectal motility, transit times, and bowel emptying often leading to constipation, fecal incontinence or a combination of both. Although these symptoms are not life-threatening, they may have a severe impact on quality of life as well as increase levels of anxiety and depression.
Various bowel management programs have been empirical, and individual solutions have been sought on a trial-and-error basis. Transanal irrigation has been used in selected patients with constipation or fecal incontinence. The majority of spinal cord injured patients in a recent study benefited from the treatment. However, there is limited evidence in the literature supporting any bowel management program in spinal cord injury in favor of another and well-designed controlled trials are still lacking. Therefore, the present study aims to compare transanal irrigation with conservative bowel management, defined as best supportive bowel care without irrigation, in a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicentre study among spinal cord injured patients with neurogenic bowel dysfunction.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 18 or over
- Spinal cord lesion at any level at least 3 months from injury
- At least one or more of the following symptoms:
- Spending ½ hour or more attempting to defecate each day or every second day
- Symptoms of autonomic dysreflexia before or during defecation
- Abdominal discomfort before or during defecation
- Episodes of faecal incontinence once or more per month
- The patient is able to understand the treatment and is willing to comply with the prescribed regimen
- The patient is able to perform transanal colonic irrigation seated on a toilet commode with or without assistance
- Signed informed consent has been obtained
Exclusion Criteria:
- Co-existing major unsolved physical problems due to the injury
- Perform transanal retrograde irrigation on a regular basis
- Evidence of bowel obstruction
- Evidence of inflammatory bowel disease
- History of cerebral palsy or cerebral apoplexy
- Multiple sclerosis
- Diabetic polyneuropathy
- Previous abdominal or perianal surgery (not including minor surgery as appendectomy or haemorrhoidectomy)
- Pregnant or lactating
- Evidence of spinal chock
- Mentally unstable
- Treatment with more than 5 mg prednisolon per day.
- PNS implant (sacral nerve stimulation)
Contacts and LocationsPlease refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00286520
| Denmark | |
| Surgical Research Unit, Department of Surgery P, Aarhus University Hospital | |
| Aarhus, Denmark, 8000 | |
| Study Chair: | Soeren Laurberg, professor, D.M.Sci | Surgical Research Unit, Department of Surgery P, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark |
More Information
Publications:
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00286520 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | DK021CC |
| Study First Received: | January 30, 2006 |
| Last Updated: | February 2, 2006 |
| Health Authority: | Denmark: Ethics Committee |
Keywords provided by University of Aarhus:
|
Constipation Fecal incontinence Spinal cord injury transanal irrigation quality of life |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Constipation Fecal Incontinence Spinal Cord Injuries Central Nervous System Diseases Digestive System Diseases Gastrointestinal Diseases Intestinal Diseases |
Nervous System Diseases Rectal Diseases Signs and Symptoms Signs and Symptoms, Digestive Spinal Cord Diseases Trauma, Nervous System Wounds and Injuries |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on February 27, 2015