Sarcosine Preventive Therapy for Individuals At High Risk for Schizophrenia
Drug: Sarcosine (N-methylglycine)
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Official Title:||Sarcosine (N-methylglycine) Trial for Individuals At Risk for Developing Schizophrenia and Related Disorders|
- Sarcosine vs. placebo in subjects at risk for developing schizophrenia:efficacy and safety. [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]
- Sarcosine is superior to placebo in the treatment of positive, negative, and cognitive (disorganized) symptoms. Safety assessed with UKU scale, vital signs measurements and laboratory parameters (SMA-20, CBC, UA) [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]
- Sarcosine vs. placebo in the treatment of neurocognitive dysfunction [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]
- To assess the efficacy of sarcosine in delay/prevention of illness progression. [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ]
|Study Start Date:||August 2006|
|Estimated Study Completion Date:||June 2009|
Drug: Sarcosine (N-methylglycine)
Randomization to two treatment groups. One group treated with sarcosine 2 g/day for 16 weeks, the other group treated with placebo 2 g/day for 16 weeks.
Schizophrenia is a neurodevelopmental disorder that affects approximately 1% of the general population and continues to be one of the major challenges of modern medicine due to the tremendous human suffering and economic costs that it involves. Once the diagnosis of schizophrenia or a related chronic psychosis has been made, the majority of patients will only partially respond to presently available pharmacological treatments and will be afflicted by long-standing deficits affecting all aspects of mental functioning.
This unfavourable outcome highlights the importance of preventive treatment for schizophrenia and related psychoses. The notion of early pharmacological intervention during the prodromal phase of these disorders has a dual aim: 1) to treat active prodromal symptoms and 2) to prevent further deterioration and progression toward the full-blown disorder and chronicity. Overall, it raises the possibility of preventing, delaying or ameliorating the onset of the diagnosable disorder. This type of intervention, although already in use in other medical branches and potentially ground-breaking for mental health delivery systems, has not been systematically assessed in the past. Recently, the development of improved criteria for detecting individuals at high risk for developing schizophrenia and related psychoses, has led to the first clinical trials that assessed the role of atypical antipsychotics (i.e., risperidone and olanzapine) for these subjects. The results of these studies indicate that significant clinical benefits nay be derived from early intervention but also point to the drawbacks of exposing patients at a very early stage of illness to antipsychotic drugs that are associated with debilitating (i.e. motor, metabolic) side effects.
The overall aim of the proposed project is to assess the efficacy and safety of the N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor (NMDAR) modulator, glycine transport inhibitor sarcosine (N-methylglycine) for the treatment of individuals fulfilling schizophrenia prodromal syndromes criteria. NMDAR's dysfunction plays a cardinal role in schizophrenia pathophysiology and the establishment of neurodevelopmental deficits. During the last decade it was demonstrated that pharmacological treatment with compounds that enhance NMDAR-mediated neurotransmission due to their agonistic activity at the NMDAR-associated glycine site (e.g. glycine, D-serine) leads to significant symptom reductions in chronic schizophrenia patients. Furthermore, preliminary findings suggest that glycine treatment may also be beneficial for patients at high risk for developing schizophrenia. By increasing glycine synaptic levels, sarcosine may generate improved therapeutic effects in high risk individuals. Sarcosine is a natural amino acid that has already been shown to reduce positive, negative and cognitive symptomatology in chronic as well as acute schizophrenia patients. Advantages of sarcosine vs. glycine site agonists use include the relatively low dose required and the lack of known side effects. Synthetic compounds conceptually similar to sarcosine are presently in various stages of development by major pharmacological companies.
In the proposed project, during a three-year period, 60 individuals fulfilling prodromal criteria will be randomly entered in a 16 week parallel group, double-blind, placebo controlled trial with 2 gr/day sarcosine, with an optional 8 week open-label extension. Clinical, neurocognitive, electrophysiological, amino acids (i.e. glycine, serine, glutamate) levels and genetic assessments will be performed during the study. The specific aims of the proposed project are: 1) to assess the efficacy and safety of sarcosine as active treatment for prodromal symptoms, 2) to assess sarcosine effects in terms of relevant amino acids serum levels, neurocognitive performance and relevant brain electrophysiological parameters and 3) to supply preliminary data in regard to the capacity of sarcosine treatment to delay/prevent conversion to full blown psychotic disorder. The overall importance of the proposed project consists of its potential to lay the foundations for an innovative type of treatment for schizophrenia prodromal states.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00276263
|Ezrath Nashim - Herzog Memorial Hospital|
|Jerusalem, Israel, 91035|
|Department of Psychiatry, Hadassah Hospital and Community Clinics|
|Principal Investigator:||Uriel Heresco-Levy, M.D.||Ezrath Nashim - Herzog Hospital / Hadassah Medical School|
|Principal Investigator:||Bernard Lerer, M.D.||Department of Psychiatry, Hadassah Hospital|