Disulfiram in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00256230|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : November 21, 2005
Last Update Posted : December 8, 2016
Melanoma remains a malignancy that is largely resistant to chemotherapy. Metastatic disease responds poorly to the treatments used today with only 2 out of 30 drugs tested, DTIC and nitrosoureas, showing response rates greater than 10%, and complete responses are rare. DTIC-based regimen has been recognized as a standard chemotherapy for advanced melanoma, and temozolomide demonstrated efficacy equal to that of DTIC and is an oral alternative agent that also crosses the blood brain barrier. Randomized phase III trials have shown no survival benefit of adding other agents (cisplatin, BCNU, and tamoxifen). Biochemotherapy is being developed extensively with moderate improvement in the responsive rate (approximately 50%) and is under evaluation in randomized trial to identify whether there is survival benefit to this strategy, compared with chemotherapy alone. Recently, a randomized phase III study comparing chemotherapy (cisplatin, dacarbazine, and tamoxifen) with biochemotherapy (the same chemotherapy regimen plus high-dose IL-2 and interferon alfa) have shown 44% response rate for biochemotherapy vs. 27% for chemotherapy. However, the tendency toward an increased response rate in patients who received biochemotherapy did not translate into an increase in overall survival, and there was, in fact, a trend for a survival advantage in patients receiving chemotherapy alone (median survival: 10.7 vs 15.8 months). New agents (or combinations) need to be developed for this refractory malignancy.
The purpose of this study is to determine the response rate and evaluate the toxicity of disulfiram (DSF) in the treatment of Stage IV melanoma.
The advantages of using DSF in this phase I/II trial are the following:
- DSF has been used as a drug for many years for the treatment of alcoholism. Its mechanism, pharmacokinetics, toxicity/tolerable dose are well known, and this drug is relatively non-toxic by itself at therapeutic dose. Doses of greater than 3000mg/m2 can cause reversible confusion.
- DSF can be taken orally; therefore, it is convenient to administer.
- DSF can penetrate the blood-brain barrier (unlike dacarbazine and many other chemotherapy agents); therefore, it might have an active effect on CNS metastasis.
This study is designed to include women and minorities, but is not designed to measure differences of intervention effect.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Stage IV Melanoma||Drug: Disulfiram (DSF)||Phase 1 Phase 2|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||7 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Single Group Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Evaluation of Disulfiram in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma and at Least One Prior Systemic Therapy, Phase I/II|
|Study Start Date :||January 2002|
|Primary Completion Date :||August 2007|
|Study Completion Date :||August 2007|
Drug: Disulfiram (DSF)
DSF pills at 250 mg will be given orally, two times a day. If this dose is tolerated, the dose will be escalated until the maximum tolerated dose is reached. Treatment will continue every day for 3 months or longer unless the disease gets worse, the side effects are too dangerous for the subject, or the subject decides to discontinue treatment.
Other Name: bis(diethylthiocarbamoyl) disulfide
- Determine response rate [ Time Frame: Every 8 weeks during therapy ]Complete response (CR)-Complete disappearance of all measurable and evaluable disease. No disease related symptoms. No evidence of non-evaluable disease, including normalization of markers and other abnormal lab values. Partial response (PR)-Applies only to patients with at least one measurable lesion. Greater than or equal to 50% decrease under baseline in the sum of products of perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions. No progression of evaluable disease. For both CR and PR, no new lesions. All assessments use the same techniques as baseline.
- Evaluate the toxicity of disulfiram administration [ Time Frame: Lab tests-Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24; X-rays/scans-Every 8 weeks ]
Accelerated titration designs are used for the maximum tolerated dose.
Patients will remain at one dose level for one week before escalated to the next higher dose level, providing that no grade II or III toxicity occurs.
Phase II is to use the maximum tolerated dose of DSF (as described above) to determine the response rate. Evaluation of toxicities will be continued. Dose reduction (switch to the next lower dose) will be carried out if patient develops grade III/IV toxicities, and this dose reduction applies to both phase I and phase II.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00256230
|United States, California|
|Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center|
|Orange, California, United States, 92868|
|Principal Investigator:||John Fruehauf, MD||Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center|