Influence of Data Collection Mode on Self-Report Validity of Asthma Therapy Adherence
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00233233|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : October 5, 2005
Last Update Posted : December 13, 2017
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Lung Diseases Asthma||Behavioral: Standardized Asthma Education Program||Not Applicable|
Self-reports are a primary source of behavioral data. Studies have highlighted the variable validity and reliability of self-report measures of health behaviors such as adherence to therapy. Research on self-reports of sensitive information, such as sexual behavior and drug use, suggests that the mode of data collection may enhance validity of self-reports. However, no studies have determined how the mode of data collection influences self-reports when an objective measure of the behavior is available.
The primary aim of this study is to examine the influence of the mode of data collection on the validity of self-reports of inhaled anti-inflammatory medication adherence.
The key secondary outcomes of the study will attempt to answer the following questions: 1) does the assessment mode influence self-reports of commonly used asthma outcome measures of disease-related symptoms, self-management behaviors, and quality of life?; 2) does the relationship between the assessment mode, the validity of self-reports of adherence, and other measures (i.e., asthma symptoms, self-management behaviors, and quality of life) change over time?; and 3) does the assessment mode interact with baseline personality characteristics and mood to influence the validity of self-reports of adherence and other outcome measures (i.e., asthma symptoms, self-management behaviors, and quality of life)?
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||139 participants|
|Official Title:||Assessment Mode and Validity of Self-Reports in Adults|
|Study Start Date :||August 2002|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||May 2005|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||May 2005|
- Concordance between patient's self-reported medication adherence and electronically measured adherence [ Time Frame: Measured at Months 1 through 5 ]
- Impact of mode of assessment on adult self-reports of asthma symptoms, asthma management practices, and quality of life [ Time Frame: Measured at Months 1 through 5 ]
- Relationship between baseline measures of psychosocial variables (i.e., personality and mood) and the primary outcome [ Time Frame: Measured at Months 1 through 5 ]
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00233233
|United States, Maryland|
|Johns Hopkins University|
|Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224|
|Principal Investigator:||Cynthia Rand, PhD||Johns Hopkins University|