EVA3S: Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients With Severe Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis - Full Text View

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether carotid angioplasty with stent (CAS) is as safe and effective as carotid surgery in regards to:

the risk of stroke and death within 30 days of the procedure;
the long-term risk of ipsilateral carotid territory stroke, in patients with recently symptomatic, severe carotid stenosis suitable for both CAS and carotid endarterectomy.

Condition	Intervention	Phase
Transient Ischemic Attack Carotid Stenosis Atherosclerosis	Device: Carotid angioplasty and stenting with cerebral protection	Phase 3


Study Type:	Interventional
Study Design:	Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Prevention
Official Title:	Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients With Severe Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Resource links provided by NLM:

MedlinePlus related topics: Angioplasty

U.S. FDA Resources

Further study details as provided by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris:

Primary Outcome Measures:

Any stroke or death within 30 days of the procedure [ Time Frame: during de study ]
Any stroke or death within 30 days of the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures:

Clinical: Myocardial infarction within 30 days of the procedure [ Time Frame: during the study ]
Clinical: Myocardial infarction within 30 days of the procedure
Other complications within 30 days of the procedure: cerebral (transient ischemic attack [TIA]) [ Time Frame: during the study ]
Other complications within 30 days of the procedure: cerebral (transient ischemic attack [TIA])
locoregional (e.g. cranial nerve palsy, complications at the site of puncture) [ Time Frame: during the study ]
locoregional (e.g. cranial nerve palsy, complications at the site of puncture)
General: Any disabling stroke or death within 30 days of the procedure plus disabling or fatal ipsilateral stroke during the follow-up period [ Time Frame: during the study ]
General: Any disabling stroke or death within 30 days of the procedure plus disabling or fatal ipsilateral stroke during the follow-up period
Any stroke or death within 30 days of the procedure plus any stroke (or any stroke or death) during the follow-up period [ Time Frame: during the study ]
Any stroke or death within 30 days of the procedure plus any stroke (or any stroke or death) during the follow-up period
TIA during the follow-up period [ Time Frame: during the study ]
TIA during the follow-up period
Functional status at the end of the study [ Time Frame: during the study ]
Functional status at the end of the study
Anatomical: Carotid restenosis (> 70% on carotid ultrasound) [ Time Frame: during the study ]
Anatomical: Carotid restenosis (> 70% on carotid ultrasound)
Integrity of the stent 2 years after the procedure (on cervical radiogram) [ Time Frame: during the study ]
Integrity of the stent 2 years after the procedure (on cervical radiogram)


Enrollment:	900
Study Start Date:	November 2000
Study Completion Date:	December 2009
Primary Completion Date:	December 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Arms	Assigned Interventions
Experimental: 1 Carotid angioplasty and stenting with cerebral protection	Device: Carotid angioplasty and stenting with cerebral protection Carotid angioplasty and stenting with cerebral protection

Detailed Description:

Findings from two large randomized clinical trials - NASCET and ECST - have established endarterectomy as the standard treatment for severe symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Compared to endarterectomy, stenting with or without cerebral protection has the advantage of avoiding general anesthesia and incision in the neck that could lead to nerve injury and wound complications. The costs may be less than those of surgery, mainly because of a shorter hospital stay. However, stenting also carries a risk of stroke and local complications. Unlike endarterectomy, which has known long-term benefits, stenting does not remove the atheromatous plaque, and the long-term efficacy of this technique needs also to be assessed. Several trials are in progress in Europe and the United States.

We established this trial to evaluate whether stenting is not inferior to endarterectomy concerning (a) the risk of stroke or death within 30 days of procedure and (b) the long-term risk of ipsilateral stroke, in patients with recently symptomatic, severe carotid stenosis.

Eligibility


Ages Eligible for Study:	18 Years and older (Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:	All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:	No

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

In brief, patients are eligible if they have experienced a carotid TIA or non disabling stroke within 4 months before randomisation and if they have an atherosclerotic stenosis of the region of the ipsilateral carotid bifurcation of 60% or more, as determined by the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) method, that investigators believe is suitable for both carotid endarterectomy and endovascular treatment. The degree of stenosis warranting treatment initially set at 70% or more was subsequently set at 60% or greater to reflect current generally accepted practice in the treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis. The presence of a 60% or more ipsilateral carotid stenosis has to be confirmed by conventional digital subtraction angiography or the combination of carotid Duplex scanning and magnetic resonance angiography, provided the results of these non-invasive techniques are concordant.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients cannot be included if they have a disabling stroke (mRS >=3), a non atherosclerotic carotid disease, a severe intracranial carotid artery stenosis, contra-indications to heparin, ticlopidine or clopidogrel.
There is no age limit.
The presence of contralateral occlusion and/or the angiographic appearance of the stenotic lesion are not factors in treatment selection. The randomisation algorithm takes centre and degree of stenosis (more or less than 90% stenosis) into account. Patients must be treated as soon as possible after random assignment, in any case within 2 weeks of randomisation.

Contacts and Locations

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00190398

Locations


France
Sainte-Anne Hospital: Department of Neurology
Paris, Ile de France, France, 75674 cedex14

Sponsors and Collaborators

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Investigators


Principal Investigator:	Jean-Louis MAS, Pr, MD, PhD	Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

More Information

Publications:

Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B, Branchereau A, Moulin T, Becquemin JP, Larrue V, Lièvre M, Leys D, Bonneville JF, Watelet J, Pruvo JP, Albucher JF, Viguier A, Piquet P, Garnier P, Viader F, Touzé E, Giroud M, Hosseini H, Pillet JC, Favrole P, Neau JP, Ducrocq X; EVA-3S Investigators. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 19;355(16):1660-71.

Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):

Mas JL, Arquizan C, Calvet D, Viguier A, Albucher JF, Piquet P, Garnier P, Viader F, Giroud M, Hosseini H, Hinzelin G, Favrole P, Hénon H, Neau JP, Ducrocq X, Padovani R, Milandre L, Rouanet F, Wolff V, Saudeau D, Mahagne MH, Sablot D, Amarenco P, Larrue V, Beyssen B, Leys D, Moulin T, Lièvre M, Chatellier G; EVA-3S Investigators. Long-term follow-up study of endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis trial. Stroke. 2014 Sep;45(9):2750-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005671. Epub 2014 Jul 31.

Rantner B, Goebel G, Bonati LH, Ringleb PA, Mas JL, Fraedrich G; Carotid Stenting Trialists' Collaboration. The risk of carotid artery stenting compared with carotid endarterectomy is greatest in patients treated within 7 days of symptoms. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Mar;57(3):619-626.e2; discussion 625-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.08.107. Epub 2012 Dec 11.

Mas JL, Trinquart L, Leys D, Albucher JF, Rousseau H, Viguier A, Bossavy JP, Denis B, Piquet P, Garnier P, Viader F, Touzé E, Julia P, Giroud M, Krause D, Hosseini H, Becquemin JP, Hinzelin G, Houdart E, Hénon H, Neau JP, Bracard S, Onnient Y, Padovani R, Chatellier G; EVA-3S investigators. Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):885-92. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70195-9. Epub 2008 Sep 5.


Responsible Party:	Cecile jourdain, Department Clinical Research of developpement
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:	NCT00190398 History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers:	P990402
Study First Received:	September 14, 2005
Last Updated:	April 29, 2011

Keywords provided by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris:


Prospective Randomised Open	Blinded End-point PROBE Study Ischemic stroke

Additional relevant MeSH terms:


Constriction, Pathologic Atherosclerosis Ischemic Attack, Transient Carotid Stenosis Pathological Conditions, Anatomical Arteriosclerosis Arterial Occlusive Diseases Vascular Diseases	Cardiovascular Diseases Brain Ischemia Cerebrovascular Disorders Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases Nervous System Diseases Carotid Artery Diseases

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 23, 2017