Response of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Optimization With Ventricle to Ventricle Timing in Heart Failure Patients
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00187200|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : September 16, 2005
Results First Posted : September 25, 2015
Last Update Posted : September 25, 2015
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the benefit of interventricular (V-V) delay optimization in reducing the non-responder rate in patients with cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (CRT-D) devices. The primary endpoint of this study is CRT responder rate.
For patients enrolled with new CRT-D systems, patients are considered non-responders if BOTH of the following requirements are fulfilled:
- < 10% improvement in 6-minute hall walk, and
- no class improvement or worsening in New York Heart Association (NYHA) scale.
For those receiving CRT-D devices as replacements of older CRT-D systems, patients are considered non-responders if BOTH of the following requirements are fulfilled:
- > 1 heart failure (HF) related hospitalization, and
- no class improvement or worsening in NYHA scale.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Heart Failure||Device: Simultaneous VV Pacing Device: Sequential VV Pacing||Phase 4|
- This is a prospective, randomized (simultaneous biventricular (BiV) pacing vs. sequential BiV pacing) study.
- Any patient that receives an FDA approved St. Jude Medical (SJM) CRT-D with V-V timing is eligible for enrollment.
- At 3 months post enrollment (or at implant for CRT-D replacements), patients screened as non-responders are randomized to either simultaneous or sequential BiV pacing. Patients requiring a replacement CRT-D device that are identified as non-responders to CRT are enrolled at the screening/randomization visit.
Patients are followed for a period of 6 months post randomization:
- Enrollment (1 week pre CRT-D implant to < 2 weeks post CRT-D implant)
- Screening/Randomization Visit (3 months post enrollment)
- Follow-up Visit (6 months post randomization)
- Total # of centers - 80 centers
- Sample size - 800 patients screened for CRT non-responders
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||816 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||RESPONSE HF - Response of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Optimization With Interventricular (VV) Timing in Heart Failure Patients|
|Study Start Date :||January 2005|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||April 2010|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||April 2010|
Active Comparator: Simultaneous VV Pacing
Programmed to simultaneous biventricular pacing
Device: Simultaneous VV Pacing
Right ventricular and left ventricular pacing delivered simultaneously.
Active Comparator: Sequential VV Pacing
Programmed to sequential biventricular pacing
Device: Sequential VV Pacing
Right ventricular and left ventricular pacing delivered sequentially.
- CRT Responder Rate [ Time Frame: 6 months ]Patients underwent baseline NYHA class and 6-minute hall walk distance (6-MHWD) assessment. After device implantation AV delays were optimized and all patients were programmed to simultaneous biventricular (BiV) pacing. At the 3-month follow-up, the NYHA class and 6-MHWD were reassessed. Non-responders were randomized 1:1 to either sequential BiV pacing with VV optimization or simultaneous BiV pacing. The responder rate at 6 months post randomization was compared between the two groups. Which is why the numbers are broken further down in the Outcome Measure table.
- NYHA Class Progression [ Time Frame: 6 months ]New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification provides a way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It places patients in one of four categories based on how much they are limited during physical activity; the limitations/symptoms are in regard to normal breathing and varying degrees in shortness of breath and/or angina pain.
- 6 Minute Hall Walk Distance Test (6-MHWD) [ Time Frame: 6 months ]Patients were considered non-responders if the 6-MHWD had not improved by greater than or equal to 10% compared to baseline. This statement is accurate and appropriate.
- Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) [ Time Frame: Randomization and 9 months ]Ejection fraction is a measurement of the percentage of blood leaving your heart each time it contracts. The left ventricle is the heart's main pumping chamber, so ejection fraction is usually measured only in the left ventricle (LV).
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00187200
|United States, Ohio|
|Ohio State University|
|Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210|
|Principal Investigator:||Raul Weiss, MD||Ohio State University|