We updated the design of this site on December 18, 2017. Learn more.
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Clinical Comparison of RPDs Retained by Conical and Galvanoformed Double Crowns.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00176215
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified July 2005 by Heidelberg University.
Recruitment status was:  Active, not recruiting
First Posted : September 15, 2005
Last Update Posted : September 15, 2005
Sponsor:
Information provided by:

Study Description
Brief Summary:
The aim of this prospective clinical trial was to investigate the clinical performance and complication rate of RPDs (Removable partial dentures) retained on conventional conical double crowns in comparison to galvanoformed telscopic double crowns. Additionally the OHIP (Oral Health related Qualitiy of Life)and the abrasion of the teeth were investigated.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Denture, Partial, Removable Dental Prosthesis Retention Oral Health Tooth Abrasion Procedure: survival failure of more than 20 % Phase 4

Study Design

Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Study Start Date : May 2003
Arms and Interventions


Outcome Measures

Eligibility Criteria

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indication for RPDs retained by double crowns; 2 to 6 Abutment teeth;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • limited contractual capability and absence of consent of the patient
Contacts and Locations

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00176215


Locations
Germany
University of Heidelberg
Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 69120
University of Heidelberg
Heidelberg, Baden_Württemberg, Germany, 69120
Sponsors and Collaborators
Heidelberg University
Investigators
Study Chair: Christiane Grossmann, DDS Heidelberg University
Principal Investigator: Franziska Lehmann, DDS Heidelberg University
More Information

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00176215     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: CG-FL-1
First Posted: September 15, 2005    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: September 15, 2005
Last Verified: July 2005

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Tooth Abrasion
Tooth Wear
Tooth Diseases
Stomatognathic Diseases