Pacing of the Atria in Sick Sinus Syndrome Trial Preventive Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation

Study Description

Go to 

Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Brief Summary:

The purpose of this study is to determine which of 4 lead positions is most effective for pacemaker patients with Sick Sinus Syndrome in order to avoid development of atrial fibrillation.

Condition or disease	Intervention/treatment	Phase
Sick Sinus Syndrome	Device: Pacing leads to be implanted according randomization.; Device: Selection 9000 prevent AF an Diagnose AF	Phase 4

Detailed Description:

The incidence of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) in Sick Sinus Syndrome patients treated with pacing is quite high. As AF can cause dizziness, fatigue, thromboembolism and ischemic stroke it is clinically relevant. Due to earlier publications pacing modes and lead placement seem to influence the incidence of AF. In this study the incidence of AF will be compared between 4 different atrial lead positions:

1. Free atrial wall
2. right atrial appendage
3. coronary sinus-os
4. Dual site right atrial pacing: b) plus c).

The following primary parameters will be evaluated during the study period of 2 years after implantation:

1. Amounts of AF episodes with a duration of > 48 hours
2. Amounts of AF episodes with a duration of > 30 minutes
3. Consultations of physicians due to AF Secondarily, AF burden, Incidence of AF in total, Quality of Life, implant duration and complications will be evaluated.

Study Design

Go to 

Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Study Type :	Interventional (Clinical Trial)
Enrollment :	456 participants
Allocation:	Randomized
Intervention Model:	Parallel Assignment
Masking:	None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:	Prevention
Official Title:	A Randomized, Prospective Multicenter Study to Examine the Optimal Position of the Atrial Leads for Therapy of the Sinus Node Syndrome
Study Start Date :	July 2000
Study Completion Date :	June 2006

Arms and Interventions

Go to 

Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Outcome Measures

Go to 

Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Primary Outcome Measures :

1. The incidence of AF is determined via memory of the pacemaker, which is saved at every follow-up visit at 1 and 10 days after implant and further on at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after implant.
2. 24-Hour ECG and treadmill exercise as well as echocardiography shall be performed before implant and 6, 12 and 24 months after implant

Secondary Outcome Measures :

1. Treadmill exercise test as well as echocardiography shall be performed before implant and 6, 12 and 24 month after implant.
2. Quality of Life questionnaires are obtained before implant and 12 and 24 months after implants

Eligibility Criteria

Go to 

Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Ages Eligible for Study:	18 Years and older (Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:	All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:	No

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

• Sick Sinus Syndrome
• Symptomatic sinus bradycardia
• Symptomatic SA block
• Bradycardia-Tachycardia-Syndrom
• Binodal diseases, Sinus Node Syndrome and high degree AV-Block
• In case of antiarrhythmic drug therapy: patient must be on a stable dose for at least 3 months before enrollment

Exclusion Criteria:

• Permanent atrial tachycardia that cannot be transferred into sinus rhythm by drugs or electric cardioversion
• Decompensated heart failure
• Dilatative cardiomyopathy with an ejection fraction < 35%
• Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
• Symptomatic hypo- or hyperthyreosis
• Myocardial infarction less than 6 months ago
• Planned cardiac surgery intervention
• Pregnant woman
• Patients under 18 years of age
• Patients involved in other studies
• Patients, already implanted with other (cardiac) leads
• Patients with reduced expectancy of life due to other diseases
• Patients who are not able to agree in participation of the study
• Patients, who cannot attend follow-up visits due to their place of residence

Contacts and Locations

Go to 

Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Locations

Germany
Helios-Klinikum Aue
Aue, Germany, 08280
Klinikum Coburg
Coburg, Germany, 96450
Ambulantes Herz-Zentrum Dresden
Dresden, Germany, 01099
Werner-Forssmann-Krankenhaus GmbH
Eberswalde, Germany, 16225
Klinikum der Joh.-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität
Frankfurt, Germany, 60596
Städtisches Krankenhaus Friedrichshafen
Friedrichshafen, Germany, 88048
Universitätskrankenhaus Eppendorf
Hamburg, Germany, 20251
Evang. Krankenhaus
Holzminden, Germany, 37603
Klinikum Ingolstadt
Ingolstadt, Germany, 85049
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Kalk GmbH
Köhl, Germany, 51103
Kreiskrankenhaus Leer
Leer, Germany, 26789
Krankenhaus Maria Hilf
Mönchengladbach, Germany, 41063

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medtronic BRC

Vitatron GmbH

Investigators

Principal Investigator:	Stefan G. Spitzer, MD

More Information

Go to 

Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Publications:

Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE, Thuesen L, Mortensen PT, Vesterlund T, Pedersen AK. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet. 1997 Oct 25;350(9086):1210-6.

Rosenqvist M, Brandt J, Schüller H. Long-term pacing in sinus node disease: effects of stimulation mode on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Am Heart J. 1988 Jul;116(1 Pt 1):16-22.

Prakash A, Saksena S, Hill M, Krol RB, Munsif AN, Giorgberidze I, Mathew P, Mehra R. Acute effects of dual-site right atrial pacing in patients with spontaneous and inducible atrial flutter and fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Apr;29(5):1007-14.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:	NCT00161538 History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers:	PASTA V.1.5
First Posted:	September 12, 2005
Last Update Posted:	October 20, 2006
Last Verified:	October 2006

Keywords provided by Medtronic BRC:

Cardiac Pacing, artificial; Atrial fibrillation; Pacemaker leads; Lead positions

Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Syndrome; Atrial Fibrillation; Sick Sinus Syndrome; Disease; Pathologic Processes	Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Heart Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases; Arrhythmia, Sinus; Heart Block