Try our beta test site
IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more...

Outcome Study of Complex Distal Radius Fractures

This study has been completed.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
University of Florida Identifier:
First received: September 8, 2005
Last updated: May 17, 2013
Last verified: June 2012
The purpose of this study is to collect information about how people do after different treatments of a broken wrist to see if one treatment has better results.

Condition Phase
Distal Radius Fractures
Phase 4

Study Type: Observational
Study Design: Observational Model: Case-Only
Official Title: Outcome Study of Complex Distal Radius Fractures: Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) With A Volar Fixed Angled Plate Versus A Distal Radius Volar (DRV) Plate Versus External Fixation

Resource links provided by NLM:

Further study details as provided by University of Florida:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Wrist Range of Motion [ Time Frame: one year post-op ]
    An improvement of all aspects of wrist motion (extension, flexion, supination and pronation) over one year post-op.

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores [ Time Frame: one year post-op ]
    An improvement of the DASH and PRWE scores over one year post-op.

Enrollment: 74
Study Start Date: April 2001
Study Completion Date: June 2012
Primary Completion Date: October 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Detailed Description:
Complex distal radius fractures are a common problem treated by orthopaedic surgeons. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcome between complex distal radius fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation using a volar fixed angled plate versus and external fixator versus DRV. The hypothesis is that the volar fixed angled plate will have a superior outcome both radiographically and clinically.

Ages Eligible for Study:   19 Years to 75 Years   (Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Sampling Method:   Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Orthopaedic clinic

Inclusion Criteria:

  • distal radius fracture

Exclusion Criteria:

  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its identifier: NCT00160810

United States, Florida
UF and Shands Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute
Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32611
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of Florida
Principal Investigator: Thomas W. Wright, M.D. University of Florida
  More Information

Responsible Party: University of Florida Identifier: NCT00160810     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 86-2001
Study First Received: September 8, 2005
Last Updated: May 17, 2013

Keywords provided by University of Florida:

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Fractures, Bone
Radius Fractures
Wounds and Injuries
Forearm Injuries
Arm Injuries processed this record on April 27, 2017