S-Caine™ Peel (Skin Numbing Cream) to Treat Pain During Vascular Access Procedures in Children
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00125255|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : July 29, 2005
Last Update Posted : June 6, 2012
The pain associated with medical procedures is often under-treated in children. Children often undergo painful procedures with little or no anesthetic, even when effective therapy is available. Reasons for not providing available therapy in children include concerns over adverse side effects as well as the length of time necessary to provide adequate anesthesia. Recent guidelines strongly advocate for the proactive treatment of pain in children, including the pain associated with medical procedures.
S-Caine™ Peel (lidocaine 7% and tetracaine 7% cream) is a eutectic formulation of lidocaine and tetracaine. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether S-Caine Peel is effective in providing topical local dermal anesthesia prior to a vascular access procedure in children 5 through 17 years of age.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Pain||Drug: S-Caine™ Peel (lidocaine and tetracaine cream 7%/7%) Drug: Placebo Peel||Phase 3|
This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study that evaluated the effectiveness of S-Caine Peel in providing local dermal anesthesia for vascular access procedures in children who were 5 through 17 years of age. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either one application of S-Caine Peel or one application of placebo for 30 minutes prior to a vascular access procedure.
During the screening visit, the study was fully explained to each patient's legal guardian and written informed consent was obtained. Whenever possible, patients provided assent. The screening visit also included: evaluating eligibility criteria; obtaining a medical history (including skin type, demographic data, and concomitant medications); obtaining a brief physical examination and urine pregnancy test (for females of childbearing potential), which had to be negative for the patient to enroll in the study; and providing patient education on how to assess pain using the Colored Analog Scale (CAS). The screening visit could occur on the same day as the procedure visit.
Upon meeting the eligibility criteria and completing the screening visit, patients were assigned the next available sequential patient number in their age group (5-11 years or 12-17 years). Based upon a randomized code, patients were randomized to receive either S Caine Peel or placebo for 30 minutes before the scheduled vascular access procedure.
The study drug application site could be on either the patient's left or right antecubital surface and covered an area of 10 cm2. A thin layer (approximately 1 mm or the thickness of a dime) of the study drug was applied evenly across the area to be treated for 30 minutes. Immediately following removal of the study drug, the study drug application site was evaluated for erythema, edema, blanching or other skin reactions. The vascular access procedure was then performed.
Upon completion of the vascular access procedure, the investigator's evaluation of procedural pain intensity and assessment of the adequacy of the anesthesia provided by the study drug were completed. Following these assessments, patients assessed their procedural pain intensity using the CAS. All pain evaluations were completed after the first attempt to gain vascular access. If the first attempt was unsuccessful and further attempts were required, the procedure was stopped and all pain assessments were performed before further attempts at vascular access were made.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||81 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)|
|Official Title:||A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Study Evaluating the Efficacy of S-Caine™ Peel (Lidocaine 7% and Tetracaine 7% Cream) for Induction of Local Dermal Anesthesia Before Vascular Access Procedures in Children|
|Study Start Date :||June 2005|
|Primary Completion Date :||October 2005|
|Study Completion Date :||October 2005|
|Experimental: S-Caine Peel||
Drug: S-Caine™ Peel (lidocaine and tetracaine cream 7%/7%)
S-Caine Peel comprising of a 1:1 eutectic mixture of 7% lidocaine and 7% tetracaine was applied topically. The study drug was applied at approximately 1 mm in thickness and remained on the treatment area for 30 minutes
Other Name: Pliaglis
|Placebo Comparator: Placebo Peel||
Drug: Placebo Peel
Placebo Peel applied topically at approximately 1 mm in thickness and remained on the treatment area for 30 minutes
Other Name: Placebo
- Pain Intensity [ Time Frame: 30 minutes ]The primary efficacy variable was pain intensity as reported by the patient using the Colored Analog Scale (CAS) (scale 0 to 10), a validated tool for measuring pain in children.
- Number of participants with adverse events [ Time Frame: 30 minutes ]To monitor the nature and frequency of adverse events (AEs) associated with the application of S-Caine Peel
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00125255
|United States, Massachusetts|
|Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115|
|Principal Investigator:||Susan T. Verghese, MD||Children's Research Institute|
|Principal Investigator:||Navil Sethna, MD||Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati|
|Principal Investigator:||Andrew Wiznia, MD||Jacobi Medical Center|