Health SMART (Stress Management and Relaxation Training) to Improve Vaccine Immune Response

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00121160

Recruitment Status : Completed

First Posted : July 21, 2005

Last Update Posted : March 27, 2012

Sponsor:

Collaborator:

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Information provided by:

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Study Description

Brief Summary:

The proposed investigation will conduct a randomized, clinical trial to test the efficacy of a cognitive behavioral stress management (CBSM) group intervention on immune response to vaccine and distress among women at elevated risk for breast cancer.

Hypothesis 1: Women who participate in the CBSM intervention will have a larger primary and secondary antibody response to vaccines compared to women in the comparison group.

Hypothesis 2: Women who participate in a 10-week CBSM group intervention will report lower levels of distress immediately after and 6 months after the intervention compared to women in the comparison group.

Condition or disease	Intervention/treatment	Phase
Psychological Stress	Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM) group intervention	Phase 1

Detailed Description:

Chronic stress can impair immune function, including immune response to vaccines. This has important implications for cancer control and prevention because tumor vaccines are emerging as tools for cancer treatment and prevention, and the cohort that would benefit from the vaccines is likely to be stressed. Women at elevated risk for breast cancer experience significant levels of distress that have been associated with immune function decrements. Interventions to treat distress-related immune decrements among these women are needed because these women will be among the first candidates for breast cancer vaccines. In theory, stress-management interventions should improve immune function and response to vaccines, but the findings to date are mixed, in part because most intervention studies have been done with medical patients who by nature have immune confounds. Thus, it is unknown how stress management interventions affect immune function in stressed but otherwise healthy people, such as women at elevated risk for breast cancer.

Comparison: Women will be randomly assigned to a 10-week structured, CBSM intervention or a wait-list comparison group with delay participation in the intervention. The comparison group will be offered the full CBSM intervention after all assessment time points have been completed.

Study Design

Layout table for study information

Study Type :	Interventional (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment :	126 participants
Allocation:	Randomized
Intervention Model:	Single Group Assignment
Masking:	None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:	Prevention
Official Title:	Can Stress Management Improve Vaccine Immune Response
Study Start Date :	September 2005
Actual Primary Completion Date :	June 2010
Actual Study Completion Date :	July 2010

Arms and Interventions

Intervention Details:

Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM) group intervention
Participants will meet in closed, structured groups of 4 to 6 women for ten weekly, 2-hour group sessions. The intervention employs CBSM techniques interwoven with information in a supportive group format. The information portion of the intervention focuses on learning to cope with daily stressors, and learning about optimal use of social support. Group members and group leaders are used as role models for effective coping and the use of social support. The groups also encourage emotional expression and provide an opportunity to practice techniques learned in the group and experience social support. Avoidance coping is discouraged, and acceptance and reframing are instead encouraged as coping responses. Health behavior change, framed as a coping technique, will also be discussed using motivational interviewing techniques. Each week participants also experience a different relaxation technique. The goal of the CBSM intervention is thus to reduce distress through a variety of techniques.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures :

Independent sample t-test will be used to compare 1) antibody change scores from before to after the first and second dose of vaccine, and 2) distress change scores from before to after the intervention [ Time Frame: length of protocol ]

Secondary Outcome Measures :

Multiple regression analyzes will be used to test changes in cortisol and changes in perceived risk of breast cancer; coping or social support mediate the effects of the intervention on antibody response to vaccine and distress [ Time Frame: length of protocol ]

Eligibility Criteria

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.

Layout table for eligibility information

Ages Eligible for Study:	18 Years to 60 Years (Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:	Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:	Yes

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Female, age 18-60 years
Family history of breast cancer
Fluent in English
Working phone
Working address
Plan to live in the area for one year

Exclusion Criteria:

Prior cancer diagnosis (except non-melanoma skin cancer)
Current major depressive episode
History of Bipolar Disorder or Schizophrenia
History of autoimmune disease
History of Hepatitis A or HA vaccination
Current infectious disease
Use of immune modulating drugs

Contacts and Locations

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00121160

Locations

Layout table for location information

United States, Washington
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98109

Sponsors and Collaborators

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Investigators

Layout table for investigator information

Principal Investigator:	Bonnie A. McGregor, PhD	Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

More Information

Publications:

McEwen BS. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan 15;338(3):171-9. Review.

Reichlin S. Alternative pathways of neural control of the immune process. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 May 1;840:301-16. Review.

Cohen S, Miller GE, Rabin BS. Psychological stress and antibody response to immunization: a critical review of the human literature. Psychosom Med. 2001 Jan-Feb;63(1):7-18. Review.

Miller GE, Cohen S. Psychological interventions and the immune system: a meta-analytic review and critique. Health Psychol. 2001 Jan;20(1):47-63.

Cohen M, Klein E, Kuten A, Fried G, Zinder O, Pollack S. Increased emotional distress in daughters of breast cancer patients is associated with decreased natural cytotoxic activity, elevated levels of stress hormones and decreased secretion of Th1 cytokines. Int J Cancer. 2002 Jul 20;100(3):347-54.

Lerman C, Kash K, Stefanek M. Younger women at increased risk for breast cancer: perceived risk, psychological well-being, and surveillance behavior. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1994;(16):171-6.

Kash KM, Holland JC, Halper MS, Miller DG. Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992 Jan 1;84(1):24-30.

Lloyd S, Watson M, Waites B, Meyer L, Eeles R, Ebbs S, Tylee A. Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling. Br J Cancer. 1996 Aug;74(3):482-7.

Hopwood P, Keeling F, Long A, Pool C, Evans G, Howell A. Psychological support needs for women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: some preliminary indicators. Psychooncology. 1998 Sep-Oct;7(5):402-12.

Erblich J, Bovbjerg DH, Valdimarsdottir HB. Looking forward and back: distress among women at familial risk for breast cancer. Ann Behav Med. 2000 Winter;22(1):53-9.

Decruyenaere M, Evers-Kiebooms G, Welkenhuysen M, Denayer L, Claes E. Cognitive representations of breast cancer, emotional distress and preventive health behaviour: a theoretical perspective. Psychooncology. 2000 Nov-Dec;9(6):528-36.

Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):

McGregor BA, Dolan ED, Murphy KM, Sannes TS, Highland KB, Albano DL, Ward AA, Charbonneau AM, Redman MW, Ceballos RM. Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management for Healthy Women at Risk for Breast Cancer: a Novel Application of a Proven Intervention. Ann Behav Med. 2015 Dec;49(6):873-84. doi: 10.1007/s12160-015-9726-z.

Layout table for additonal information

Responsible Party:	Bonnie A. McGregor, PhD / Assistant Member, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:	NCT00121160
Other Study ID Numbers:	IRB-6003 NCI-K01-CA107085-01
First Posted:	July 21, 2005 Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted:	March 27, 2012
Last Verified:	March 2012

Keywords provided by Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center:


immune response to vaccines stress management breast cancer

Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Layout table for MeSH terms

Stress, Psychological Behavioral Symptoms

To Top