Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Treating Older Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML-19)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00091234|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified July 2012 by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC.
Recruitment status was: Recruiting
First Posted : September 9, 2004
Last Update Posted : July 24, 2012
RATIONALE: Monoclonal antibodies such as gemtuzumab ozogamicin can locate cancer cells and either kill them or deliver cancer-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. It is not yet known whether gemtuzumab ozogamicin is more effective than standard supportive care in treating older patients who have acute myeloid leukemia.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II/III trial is studying two different gemtuzumab ozogamicin regimens to see how well they work compared to standard supportive care in treating older patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Leukemia||Drug: gemtuzumab ozogamicin||Phase 2 Phase 3|
- Compare the feasibility, toxicity, and antileukemic activity of two different dosing regimens of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) vs standard supportive care in older patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia who are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy. (phase II)
- Compare the efficacy and toxicity of the best dosing regimen of GO selected from phase II vs standard supportive care, in terms of overall survival, in these patients. (phase III)
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter phase II study followed by a phase III study. Patients are stratified according to age (61 to 75 vs 76 to 80 vs 81 and over), CD33-positivity of bone marrow blasts (< 20% vs 20-80% vs > 80% vs unknown), initial WBC before hydroxyurea administration (< 30,000/mm^3 vs ≥ 30,000/mm^3), WHO performance status (0-1 vs 2 vs 3-4), and participating center.
Phase II: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) IV over 2 hours on days 1 and 8. Patients with stable or responding disease at day 36 receive GO IV over 2 hours every 4 weeks for up to 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II: Patients receive GO IV over 2 hours on days 1, 3, and 5. Patients with stable or responding disease at day 36 receive GO IV over 2 hours every 4 weeks for up to 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm III: Patients receive standard supportive care.
Phase III: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive the selected treatment (arm I or arm II) from phase II.
- Arm II: Patients receive standard supportive care. Patients who receive GO treatment are followed monthly for 1 year and then every 3 months thereafter. Patients who receive standard supportive care are followed at least every 4 weeks.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 259 patients (75 for phase II [25 per treatment arm] and 184 for phase III [92 per treatment arm]) will be accrued for this study within 2.5 years.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||279 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) Monotherapy Versus Standard Supportive Care for Previously Untreated AML in Elderly Patients Who Are Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: A Randomized Phase II/III Trial (AML-19) of the EORTC-LG and GIMEMA-ALWP|
|Study Start Date :||June 2004|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||December 2013|
- Proportion of patients able to start continuation therapy (Phase II)
- Overall survival (Phase III)
- Rate of complete remission (CR+CRp)by the end of continuation therapy, for patients in the GO arms (Phase II)
- Overall survival (Phase II)
- Toxicity (CTCAE grading), including time to hematological recovery (Phase II & III)
- Rate of complete remisison (CR+CRp) by the end of induction and by the end of continuation therapy, for patients in GO arm (Phase III)
- Disease-free survival for patients who reached CR or CRp (Phase III)
- Progression-free survival from randomization for patients in GO arm (Phase III)
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00091234
|Contact: Hilde Breyssensemail@example.com|
|Principal Investigator:||Sergio Amadori, MD||EORTC - AZIENDA OSPEDALLERA UNIVERSITARIA - POLICLINICO TOR VERGATA, IT|
|Principal Investigator:||Giuliana Alimena||GIMEMA - Universita Degli Studi "La Sapeinza"|