Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED II)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00007085|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : December 8, 2000
Last Update Posted : July 29, 2016
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Lung Diseases Pulmonary Embolism Venous Thromboembolism||Device: Tomography, X-ray Computed||Not Applicable|
Approximately 600,000 Americans sustain pulmonary embolism each year; one-third of these episodes are fatal. Unfortunately, pulmonary embolism is underdiagnosed and, therefore, under-treated. A substantial body of evidence suggests that the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism is not made in the majority of patients in whom it causes or contributes to death.
In the main, there are two explanations for the failure to diagnose pulmonary embolism: pulmonary embolism may be clinically silent, and there is no definitive, noninvasive diagnostic test. Indeed, ventilation perfusion lung scans are nondiagnostic in the majority of patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary angiography may be used to establish a diagnosis in such patients, but it is underutilized because of a mortality risk around 1 percent.
Recently, relatively small studies have suggested that contrast enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT) scanning is a useful diagnostic test for pulmonary embolism, with sensitivity as high as 80 percent and specificity as high as 95 percent. Spiral CT is widely available and much less invasive than pulmonary angiography. If spiral CT could be established as a useful diagnostic test, pulmonary embolism would be diagnosed more effectively and more patients would receive proper treatment.
The study evaluates the role of spiral CT scan in the diagnosis of PE by comparison with a composite reference test, including pulmonary angiography, V/Q lung scan in patients without prior PE and compression ultrasound of the lower extremities in patients with no prior deep venous thrombosis (DVT).
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Study Start Date :||September 2000|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||December 2004|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||December 2004|
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00007085
|OverallOfficial:||Sarah Fowler||George Washington University|
|OverallOfficial:||Charles Hales||Massachusetts General Hospital|
|OverallOfficial:||Russell Hull||University of Calgary|
|OverallOfficial:||Kenneth Leeper||Emory University|
|OverallOfficial:||John Popovich||Case Western Reserve Univ-Henry Ford HSC|
|OverallOfficial:||Henry Sostman||Weill Medical College of Cornell University|
|OverallOfficial:||Paul Stein||St. Joseph Mercy|
|OverallOfficial:||Victor Tapson||Duke University|
|OverallOfficial:||John Weg||University of Michigan at Ann Arbor|
|OverallOfficial:||Pamela Woodard||Washington University School of Medicine|