Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Patients Suspected of Having Lung Cancer
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00005071|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified June 2007 by National Cancer Institute (NCI).
Recruitment status was: Active, not recruiting
First Posted : April 19, 2004
Last Update Posted : November 6, 2013
RATIONALE: Diagnostic procedures and treatment-planning systems may affect outcome in patients suspected of having lung cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized diagnostic trial to compare the effectiveness of two types of diagnostic and treatment-planning systems in patients who are suspected of having lung cancer.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Lung Cancer||Procedure: biopsy Procedure: bronchoscopy Procedure: computed tomography Procedure: quality-of-life assessment||Not Applicable|
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the survival rate of patients with suspected lung cancer when diagnosed and managed using the conventional locally based approach versus a new centralized system using a 2 stop diagnosis. II. Compare the resection rate in both diagnostic arms. III. Assess the quality of service given in both diagnostic arms.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients present to a general practitioner where they are referred to the local chest clinic. Patients are seen by the chest physician and, if deemed eligible, are randomized between 2 diagnostic arms. Arm I (Conventional Locally Based Diagnosis): Patients undergo bronchoscopy and CT scan as appropriate, and then are discussed or referred by individual chest physicians, as is the current practice. The optimal period for diagnosis and discussion of management plans is 6 weeks. Arm II (Centralized 2 Stop Diagnosis): Patients undergo CT scan the following Monday morning. The consultant radiologist advises the most appropriate diagnostic test (e.g., bronchoscopy or percutaneous needle biopsy) to be done that same Monday. A tissue diagnosis is available Thursday morning for the multidisciplinary meeting attended by the chest physician, medical and clinical oncologists, and a surgeon, and the patient treatment plan is decided. Quality of life is assessed at baseline and at 6 weeks. Patients are followed for 2 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 252-315 patients will be accrued for this study within 2 years.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Official Title:||A Pilot Study Leading to a Randomized Trial Comparing Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Lung Cancer Investigated in the Conventional Locally (LO) Based (BA) Chest Clinic Compared With a Centralized 2 Stop Pathway (LOBA 2STOP)|
|Study Start Date :||October 1998|
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00005071
|Royal Marsden Hospital|
|Sutton, England, United Kingdom, SM2 5PT|
|Study Chair:||Mary O'Brien, MD||Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust|