EP-Catheter Guided CS-Lead Implantation
In patients undergoing CRT device implantation a lead positioning in the coronary sinus is required. Even this part of the surgical procedure is challenging. In this study we compared retrospectively to methods of CS-lead implantation: conventional vs. EP-catheter guided.
Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
Left Bundle Branch Block
|Study Design:||Observational Model: Case Control
Time Perspective: Retrospective
|Official Title:||Conventional Versus EP-Catheter Guided Implantation of Coronary Sinus Lead in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy|
- Total Fluoroscopy Time [ Time Frame: During implantation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]During CRT device implantation fluoroscopy is used and the total fluoroscopy time is counted.
- Contrast medium account [ Time Frame: During surgical procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]contrast medium is used and counted during crt device implantation.
- Successful implantation [ Time Frame: During surgical procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Successful crt implantation was defined as effective positioning of RV and CS lead +/- right atrial lead.
- Procedure related complications [ Time Frame: 24 hours after start of surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]All complications during time frame of 24 hours after start of surgery were proved whether they were procedure related.
|Study Start Date:||August 2013|
|Study Completion Date:||August 2013|
|Primary Completion Date:||August 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
In this group CS lead was implanted in a conventional manner.
In this group coronary sinus was canulated using a steerable electrophysiology catheter.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01922544
|University of Cologne|
|Cologne, NRW, Germany, 50937|