Diagnostic Performance of Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve From Computed Tomography (PERFECT)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Fractional Flow Reserve derived from computed tomography(FFRCT) is a novel method for determining the physiologic significance of coronary artery disease (CAD), which will help physicians in clinical decision-making and decrease the medical cost, but its ability to identify patients with ischemia has not been adequately examined to date.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Coronary Artery Disease |
Device: FFR (PressureWire) |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Diagnostic |
| Official Title: | Individual-Patient-Data Pooled-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve From Anatomic CT Angiography |
- Diagnostic Accuracy of FFRCT [ Time Frame: 1 day ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Diagnostic accuracy[Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV)]* of FFRCT to determine presence or absence of at least one hemodynamically (HD)-significant coronary artery stenosis at the subject level using binary outcomes when compared to FFR as the reference standard..*Sensitivity measures the proportion of actual positives which are correctly identified. Specificity measures the proportion of negatives which are correctly identified;PPV, or precision rate is the proportion of positive test results that are true positives (such as correct diagnoses);NPV is defined as the proportion of subjects with a negative test result who are correctly diagnosed.
- Diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT at the subject level [ Time Frame: 1 day ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of FFRCT at the subject level using binary outcomes when compared to FFR as the reference standard.
- Diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT at the vessel level [ Time Frame: 1 day ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of FFRCT for the presence or absence of HD-significant coronary artery stenosis at the vessel level using binary outcomes when compared to FFR as the reference standard.
- FFR Numerical Correlation [ Time Frame: 1 day ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Per-vessel correlation of the FFRCT numerical value alone with the FFR numerical value measured during cardiac catheterization.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 300 |
| Study Start Date: | December 2012 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | April 2013 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | March 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Single arm study
Single arm study.The investigators will conduct computed tomography,angiography and FFR measurement during angiography in this single arm.
|
Device: FFR (PressureWire)
Fractional flow reserve measured during cardiac catheterization——A pressure-monitoring guidewire(PressureWire Certus, St. Jude Medical Systems, Uppsala, Sweden;ComboWire, Volcano Corporation, San Diego, California) will be advanced past the stenosis.
Other Names:
|
Detailed Description:
Fractional Flow Reserve derived from computed tomography(FFRCT) is a novel method for determining the physiologic significance of coronary artery disease (CAD), which will help physicians in clinical decision-making and decrease the medical cost, but its ability to identify patients with ischemia has not been adequately examined to date.
Available data from registered clinical trials has testified the diagnostic performance of FFRCT, but the diagnostic accuracy among them are not consistent.
Thus, the investigators designed a collaborative individual patient-data pooled-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT and find the possible cause for inconsistency
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Coronary computed tomographic angiography(CCTA) with over 50 percent stenosis in a major coronary artery over 2mm diameter
- Undergoing clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography with FFR
Exclusion Criteria:
- A history of CABG surgery
- Prior percutaneous coronary intervention with suspected instent restenosis
- Suspicion of or recent acute coronary syndrome
- Complex congenital heart disease
- Prior pacemaker or defibrillator
- Prosthetic heart valve
- Significant arrhythmia
- heart rate >100 beats/min
- systolic blood pressure≤90 mmHg
- contraindication to beta blockers, nitroglycerin or adenosine
- Serum creatinine level greater than 1.5 mg per dL
- Allergy to iodinated contrast
- Pregnant state
- Body mass index greater than 35
- Evidence of active clinical instability or lifethreatening disease
- Canadian Cardiovascular Society class IV angina
- nonevaluable CCTA as determined by the CCTA core laboratory
- Inability to adhere to study procedures
Contacts and Locations| China | |
| Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital | |
| Shanghai, China, 200072 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Ya-Wei Xu, MD, FACC | Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine |
More Information
Additional Information:
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Ya-Wei Xu, MD,FACC, Shanghai 10th People's Hospital |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01747317 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | TENTH1010 |
| Study First Received: | December 9, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | December 10, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by Shanghai 10th People's Hospital:
|
FFR fractional flow reserve CT Computed Tomography |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Coronary Artery Disease Myocardial Ischemia Coronary Disease Heart Diseases |
Cardiovascular Diseases Arteriosclerosis Arterial Occlusive Diseases Vascular Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013