The Dutch Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation Trial (Dutch AMR)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to compare early mitral valve repair versus a watchful waiting strategy in asymptomatic patients with severe organic mitral valve regurgitation and preserved left ventricular function.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Heart; Disease, Mitral(Valve) Diseases of Mitral Valve Mitral Valve Insufficiency |
Other: Watchful waiting Procedure: Early mitral valve repair |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Dutch AMR; Early Mitral Valve Repair Versus Watchful Waiting in Asymptomatic Patients With Severe Organic Mitral Regurgitation; a Multicenter, Randomised Trial. |
- Composite endpoint: cardiovascular mortality, congestive heart failure and hospitalization for nonfatal cardiovascular events [ Time Frame: Min. 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The primary outcome is defined as time to first event of the composite endpoint of cardiovascular mortality, congestive heart failure and hospitalization for nonfatal cardiovascular events
- Cardiovascular mortality [ Time Frame: Min. 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Secondary outcome measures the separate component cardiovascular mortality at a minimum of 5 years.
- Congestive heart failure [ Time Frame: Min. 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Secondary outcome measures the separate component congestive heart failure at a minimum of 5 years.
- Hospitalization for nonfatal cardiovascular events [ Time Frame: Min. 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Secondary outcome measures the separate component hospitalization for nonfatal cardiovascular events (including but not limited to acute coronary syndrome, arrhythmia and heart surgery) at a minimum of 5 years.
- All-cause mortality [ Time Frame: Min. 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Secondary outcome measures the incidence of all-cause mortality at a minimum of 5 years.
- Costs and effectiveness [ Time Frame: Min. 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Secondary outcome measures total direct and indirect costs and cost-effectiveness at a minimum of 5 years.
- Quality of life [ Time Frame: Min. 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Secondary outcome measures health-related quality of life at a minimum of 5 years.
- Echocardiographic parameters [ Time Frame: Min. 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Secondary outcome measures echocardiographic parameters at a minimum of 5 years.
- CMR parameters [ Time Frame: Min. 5 years. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Secondary outcome measures Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance imaging (CMR)parameters (left ventricular function, left atrial dimensions, pulmonary hypertension) at a minimum of 5 years.
- Atrial fibrillation [ Time Frame: Min. 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Secondary outcome measures the incidence of asymptomatic atrial fibrillation at a minimum of 5 years.
- Exercise test parameters [ Time Frame: Min. 5 years. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Secondary outcome measures exercise test parameters at a minimum of 5 years.
- BNP [ Time Frame: Min. 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Secondary outcome measures brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) plasma levels at a minimum of 5 years.
- Surgery complication rate [ Time Frame: Min. 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The complication rate in the mitral valve surgery group (e.g. re-operation for bleeding, pneumonia, residual or recurrent mitral valve regurgitation) will be determined at a minimum of 5 years.
- Rate of surgery [ Time Frame: Min. 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Rate of surgery in the watchful waiting group will be determined at a minimum of 5 years.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 250 |
| Study Start Date: | February 2013 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | February 2021 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | February 2016 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Early mitral valve repair
Early mitral valve repair
|
Procedure: Early mitral valve repair
Patients in the group of early mitral valve repair will be operated by way of routine mitral valve repair procedures in specialized centres.
|
|
Active Comparator: Watchful waiting
Watchful waiting
|
Other: Watchful waiting
In case of watchful waiting a conservative treatment is performed, based on close monitoring of the patient for clear signs of deterioration that triggers facilitated surgery before left ventricular dysfunction is present.
|
Detailed Description:
Severe asymptomatic organic mitral valve (MV) regurgitation with preserved left ventricular (LV) function is a challenging clinical entity as data on the recommended treatment strategy for these patients are scarce and conflicting, which is reflected in current guidelines. European guidelines advocate a more conservative strategy i.e. watchful waiting, with yearly echocardiography, whilst American guidelines are more in favour of early surgery to reconstruct the MV, i.e. MV repair (in contrast to MV replacement) in order to prevent future LV dysfunction and complaints.
A number of non-randomised trials show a favourable outcome of early surgery and the early surgery strategy has shown to be associated with improved long-term survival, decreased cardiac mortality and decreased morbidity compared with the conservative management [citations 1-3]. On the other hand, non-randomised trials describe also that a conservative strategy (i.e. watchful waiting) can be safely accomplished. If facilitated surgery is performed in this population it has proven to be eventually associated with good perioperative and postoperative outcome in 50% of the patients at 10 years when careful follow-up is being carried out [citation 4]. Non-randomised trials inherently have a number of drawbacks. A randomised trial comparing both strategies and objectivising the best treatment strategy has never been performed.
The Dutch AMR (Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation) trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomised trial comparing early MV repair versus watchful waiting in asymptomatic patients with severe organic MV regurgitation and preserved LV function [citation 5].
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 70 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Asymptomatic
- Severe organic mitral valve regurgitation.
- Preserved left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction >60% and left ventricular end-systolic dimension ≤45 mm)
- The likelihood of MV repair should be more than 90% determined by the local heart team with a cardiologist and cardiothoracic surgeon
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pulmonary hypertension (>50 mmHg at rest)
- Atrial fibrillation
- Physical inability as determined by the heart team to undergo surgery
- Other life-threatening morbidity
- Higher expected surgical risks in advance, according to the dedicated heart team
- Moderate to severe kidney disease (eGFR less than 30 mL/min)
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Steven AJ Chamuleau, MD, PhD | 0031 88 75 56176 | S.A.J.Chamuleau@umcutrecht.nl |
| Contact: Jolanda Kluin, MD, PhD | 0031 88 75 56179 | J.Kluin@umcutrecht.nl |
| Netherlands | |
| Leiden University Medical Center | Not yet recruiting |
| Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands, 2333 ZA | |
| Contact: Robert JM Klautz, prof. MD PhD 0031 71 526 4022 r.j.m.klautz@lumc.nl | |
| Principal Investigator: Robert JM Klautz, prof. MD PhD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Rosemarijn Jansen, MD | |
| University Medical Center Utrecht (UMC Utrecht) | Recruiting |
| Utrecht, Netherlands, 3584 CX | |
| Contact: Steven AJ Chamuleau, MD, PhD 0031 88 75 56176 S.A.J.Chamuleau@umcutrecht.nl | |
| Contact: Jolanda Kluin, MD, PhD 0031 88 75 56179 J.Kluin@umcutrecht.nl | |
| Principal Investigator: Steven AJ Chamuleau, MD, PhD | |
| Principal Investigator: Jolanda Kluin, MD, PhD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Rosemarijn Jansen, MD | |
| Principal Investigator: | Steven AJ Chamuleau, MD, PhD | University Medical Center Utrecht (UMC Utrecht) |
| Principal Investigator: | Jolanda Kluin, MD, PhD | University Medical Center Utrecht (UMC Utrecht) |
| Principal Investigator: | Robert JM Klautz, Prof. MD PhD | Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC Leiden) |
More Information
Additional Information:
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | S.A.J. Chamuleau, MD, PhD, UMC Utrecht |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01708265 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | NL39851.041.12. |
| Study First Received: | October 11, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | February 5, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | Netherlands: The Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO) |
Keywords provided by UMC Utrecht:
|
Mitral Valve Insufficiency Mitral Valve Regurgitation Asymptomatic Mitral Valve Regurgitation |
Asymptomatic Mitral Valve Insufficiency Mitral Valve Repair Watchful Waiting |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Heart Valve Diseases Mitral Valve Insufficiency Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 21, 2013