Repair of Infective Wound Associated With Nerve Defect in the Finger Using A Bipedicled Nerve Flap
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
The Second Hospital of Tangshan
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
The Second Hospital of Tangshan
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01707654
First received: October 12, 2012
Last updated: October 15, 2012
Last verified: April 2012
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
A combination of soft tissue and digital nerve defects in the finger results in sensory loss of the finger pulp. Reconstruction of these combined injuries is difficult. When the neurocutaneous defect is associated with wound infection, reconstructive alternatives are more limited. From July 2008 to May 2010, a retrospective study was conducted with 9 consecutive postinfection patients who had the neurocutaneous defect of the finger following trauma. The purpose of this retrospective study is to report repair of the complicated infected wound in the finger using the bipedicled nerve flap and to evaluate the efficacy of this technique.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Infection Wound Disruption of Nerve Repair |
Device: Nerve flap |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
Further study details as provided by The Second Hospital of Tangshan:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- 2-point discrimination test [ Time Frame: 17-25 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The test points were at the center of the radial or ulnar portion of the pulp. Each area was tested 3 times with a Discriminator (Ali Med, Dedham, MA). We stopped at 4mm as a limit of 2PD and considered this normal.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Semmes-Weinstein (SW) monofilament test [ Time Frame: 17-25 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The test points were at the center of the radial or ulnar portion of the pulp. The donor site, i.e. radial- or ulnar-dorsal aspect of the middle phalanx of the donor digit, was also evaluated.
Other Outcome Measures:
- Pain [ Time Frame: 17-25 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Pain was given subjectively by the patient using the visual analogue scale (VAS). The VAS consists of a 10 cm line that was grouped into mild (1-3 cm), moderate (4-6 cm) and severe (7-10 cm).
| Enrollment: | 9 |
| Study Start Date: | July 2008 |
| Study Completion Date: | February 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date: | May 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
nerve graft
Simultaneous repair of the infected wound and digital nerve defect in the finger using a bipedicled nerve flap including nerve graft from the dorsal branch of the digital nerve.
|
Device: Nerve flap
Based on the Teoh et al.'s technique, we combined the nerve graft into the bipedicled heterodigital arterialized island flap and used this composite flap tissue for reconstructing complicated infected wound in the finger.
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 16 Years to 55 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- an infective wound with exposed bone or tendon in the finger;
- soft tissue defect involving proximal half of the middle phalanx, the proximal phalanx, or both;
- associated digital nerve defect 1 to 4 cm in length;
- single or double nerve defects; and
- simultaneous repair of nerve and soft tissue defects.
Exclusion Criteria:
- injury to the course of the pedicle or the donor site;
- nerve defect less than 1 cm or larger than 4 cm in length;
- occurrence of the defect in a region the flap is unable to reach, such as distal interphalangeal joint region, distal portion of the middle phalanx of the middle finger and the thumb;
- no involvement of the digital nerve.
Contacts and Locations
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | The Second Hospital of Tangshan |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01707654 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | TSChen6017, HEBEI-J06451 |
| Study First Received: | October 12, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | October 15, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration China: Ethics Committee |
Keywords provided by The Second Hospital of Tangshan:
|
defect; dorsal branch of the proper digital nerve; proper digital nerve; finger sensory reconstruction. |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013