A Trial to Compare the Laser Treatment (SLT vs. ALT) in Glaucoma Patients (SLTRepeat)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Lasers are important therapy in glaucoma. They are a pivotal point in treatment between medical and surgical care. Over the last 10 years a new laser has emerged as the usual laser treatment: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT). SLT works as well as the older laser used: argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT). However SLT has many theoretical benefits over ALT including causing less damage to the tissue it affects. One of the potential patient centered benefits of this laser is that it may be repeatable. It is even possible that the old laser ALT may be useable after an SLT treatment. This study aims to uncover whether repeat laser is possible after SLT and if so which laser is more effective (ALT vs SLT). The potential of repeating laser therapies may delay surgical treatment and its complications. Also understanding which laser to use will help eye doctors know how to treat their patients at this point of the disease.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Glaucoma |
Procedure: Argon laser trabeculoplasty Procedure: Selective laser trabeculoplasty |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Randomized Clinical Trial of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT)in Medically Uncontrolled Open Angle Glaucoma Who Had Been Previously Treated With Complete SLT |
- Intraocular Pressure [ Time Frame: 12 months post operatively ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]IOP difference between baseline and 12 month post-laser.
- To compare the IOP lowering effect between the groups at other postoperative visits [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]IOP difference between baseline, 1hr, 1 wk, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 mon post-laser.
- To compare the visual acuity between the groups at all visits. [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]VA difference between baseline, 1hr, 1 wk, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 mon post-laser.
- To compare the trabecular meshwork pigmentation between the groups at all visits. [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- To compare any adverse events between the two groups at all visits. [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 144 |
| Study Start Date: | November 2012 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | November 2015 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | November 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Argon laser trabeculoplasty
Up to the year 2005, the vast majority of ophthalmologists used Argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) as the mode of laser therapy. ALT is effective but its most significant problem is that its effectiveness decreases with re-treatment since the tissue it targets (the trabecular meshwork) is changed by the laser rendering repeat treatments less effective.
|
Procedure: Argon laser trabeculoplasty
With Argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT), thermal energy is used directed towards the Trabecular Meshwork (the site of aqueous drainage from the eye),which causes focal scarring of trabecular meshwork, thus enable fluid drainage more effectively. However, this procedure may not be repeatable since it causes too much damage to the trabecular meshwork.
Procedure: Selective laser trabeculoplasty
Selective laser trabeculoplasty is a relatively newer technology that uses a Nd:YAG laser to target specific cells within the trabecular meshwork. SLT does not cause coagulative damage to the trabecular meshwork, and thus has the advantage of being repeatable.
|
|
Active Comparator: selective laser trabeculoplasty
Post 2005, a newer mode of laser therapy, selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) has emerged as the standard of care laser. There are many potential advantages to SLT but to date these advantages are only theoretical. The most important potential clinical advantage of SLT is that it causes less damage to the tissue it targets.
|
Procedure: Argon laser trabeculoplasty
With Argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT), thermal energy is used directed towards the Trabecular Meshwork (the site of aqueous drainage from the eye),which causes focal scarring of trabecular meshwork, thus enable fluid drainage more effectively. However, this procedure may not be repeatable since it causes too much damage to the trabecular meshwork.
Procedure: Selective laser trabeculoplasty
Selective laser trabeculoplasty is a relatively newer technology that uses a Nd:YAG laser to target specific cells within the trabecular meshwork. SLT does not cause coagulative damage to the trabecular meshwork, and thus has the advantage of being repeatable.
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Over age of 18 yo.
- OAG including pigmentary dispersion syndrome and pseudoexfoliation
- OAG has been treated with 360 degrees of SLT
- OAG failed medical therapy,
- two sighted eyes,
- willing to participate after being informed of and reading the patient information material.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Narrow angle glaucoma
- Advanced visual field defect
- Previous glaucoma surgery
- Eye surgery expected in the next 12 months
- Severe corneal disease
- On or anticipated steroid in 6 months
- Pregnant or breast feeding
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Francie F Si, MD | 519-6466000 ext 61244 | francie.si@lhsc.on.ca |
| Contact: William G Hodge, MD, PhD | 519-6466000 ext 66210 | william.hodge@sjhc.london.on.ca |
| Canada, Alberta | |
| Rockyview General Hospital, University of Calgary | |
| Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T3E 7M8 | |
| Royal Alexandra Hospital, University of Alberta | Not yet recruiting |
| Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T5H 3V9 | |
| Contact: Karim Damji, MD, FRCSC 780- 735-4200 kdamji@ualberta.ca | |
| Contact: Sourabh Arora, BSc., MD 780 735 1111 ext 12447 <sourabh@ualberta.ca> | |
| Principal Investigator: Karim Damji, MD, FRCSC | |
| Canada, Nova Scotia | |
| Eye Care Centre, Dalhousie University | Not yet recruiting |
| Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H2R1 | |
| Contact: Marcelo Nicolela, MD, FRCSC 902- 473-3622 nicolela@dal.ca | |
| Contact: Neasa Bheilbigh, B.A. 902-473-3236 neasabheilbigh@gmail.com | |
| Principal Investigator: Marcelo Nicolela, MD, FRCSC | |
| Canada, Ontario | |
| Ivey Eye Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital, Western University | Not yet recruiting |
| London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4V2 | |
| Sub-Investigator: Cindy Hutnik, MD, FRCSC | |
| Principal Investigator: William Hodge, MD, FRCSC | |
| Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto | Not yet recruiting |
| Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5 | |
| Contact: Catherine Birt, MD, FRCSC 416-480-5882 catherine.birt@sunnybrook.ca | |
| Contact: Charlene Muller, RN, PHN,CCRP 416-480-5091 Charlene.Muller@sunnybrook.ca | |
| Principal Investigator: Catherine Birt, MD, FRCSC | |
| Principal Investigator: | William G Hodge, MD, PhD | Lawson Research Institute, Western Ontario |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | William Hodge, Chair and Professor of Department of Ophthalmology, Lawson Health Research Institute |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01687465 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CIHR granted glaucoma RCT |
| Study First Received: | September 11, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | September 19, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Canada: Canadian Institutes of Health Research |
Keywords provided by Lawson Health Research Institute:
|
glaucoma laser SLT ALT |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Glaucoma Ocular Hypertension Eye Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013