Anodal and Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Stroke Recovery (tDCS)

The recruitment status of this study is unknown because the information has not been verified recently.
Verified May 2012 by Assiut University.
Recruitment status was  Active, not recruiting
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Dina Hatem Elhammady, Assiut University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01601392
First received: May 11, 2012
Last updated: May 16, 2012
Last verified: May 2012
  Purpose

The purpose of this study will to compare the long-term effect of anodal versus cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients. Forty patients with subacute ischemic stroke will randomly assigned to one of three groups: Anodal, Cathodal and Sham. Each group will receive tDCS at an intensity of 2mA for 25 minutes daily for 6 consecutive days over the affected (Anodal, Sham) or unaffected (Cathodal) motor cortex. Patients will be assessed with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), the Barthel index (BI) and the Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle strength scale at baseline, after end of the 6th tDCS session, and then 1, 2 and 3 months later. Motor cortical excitability will be measured at baseline and after the 6th session in both hemispheres.


Condition Intervention
Stroke
Procedure: transcranial direct current stimulation (Anodal)
Procedure: transcranial direct current stimulation (Cathodal)
Procedure: transcranial direct current stimulation (Sham)

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Effect of Anodal Versus Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Stroke Recovery: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Further study details as provided by Assiut University:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Motor power improvement [ Time Frame: 3 Months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    improvement in the motor power of paretic patient as measured in one proximal and one distal muscle group testing in upper (shoulder abduction + hand grip) and lower limbs ( hip flexion + toes dorsiflexion).


Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Motor cortical excitability [ Time Frame: 1 Month ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The difference in the motor cortical excitability (RMT, AMT) before and after tDCS


Enrollment: 40
Study Start Date: January 2011
Estimated Study Completion Date: June 2012
Estimated Primary Completion Date: May 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Experimental: Anodal tDCS Procedure: transcranial direct current stimulation (Anodal)
The anodal group will receive tDCS for 25 minutes at 2mA daily for 6 consecutive days on the affected hemisphere.
Active Comparator: Cathodal tDCS Procedure: transcranial direct current stimulation (Cathodal)
The Cathodal group will receive tDCS for 25 minutes at 2mA daily for 6 consecutive days on the unaffected hemisphere.
Sham Comparator: Sham Procedure: transcranial direct current stimulation (Sham)
The sham group will receive sham tDCS for 25 minutes daily for 6 consecutive days on the affected hemisphere.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   40 Years to 70 Years
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • acute hemiparesis with single thromboembolic non-hemorrhagic infarction documented by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • Accept to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • extensive infarction (taking all territories of middle cerebral artery)
  • severe flaccid hemiplegia
  • head injury
  • Any other neurological disease other than stroke
  • previous administration of tranquilizer
  • patients who are unable to give informed consent because of severe aphasia, or cognitive deficit.
  • Patients with no motor evoked response recorded from First Dorsal Interosseus (FDI) muscle of the affected hand
  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01601392

Locations
Egypt
Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University
Assiut, Egypt
Sponsors and Collaborators
Dina Hatem Elhammady
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Eman M Khedr, Professor Assiut University
  More Information

No publications provided

Responsible Party: Dina Hatem Elhammady, Clinical Professor, Assiut University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01601392     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: tDCS in stroke recovery
Study First Received: May 11, 2012
Last Updated: May 16, 2012
Health Authority: Egypt: Ministry of Higher Education

Keywords provided by Assiut University:
Ischemic stroke
direct current stimulation
motor threshold
National institutes of Health Stroke Scale
Barthel index scale
Measurement of motor power improvement

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Stroke
Cerebral Infarction
Cerebrovascular Disorders
Brain Diseases
Central Nervous System Diseases
Nervous System Diseases
Vascular Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases
Brain Infarction
Brain Ischemia

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on September 22, 2014