A Study to Evaluate Two Different Surgical Methods for Treatment for Abdominal Wall Diastasis
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This is a three armed prospective randomized trial that will compare two different surgical techniques for reconstruction of the abdominal wall diastasis with a conservative treatment procedure.
The study hypothesis:
Which surgical approach provides the safest and best long term results for patients with abdominal wall diastasis either the insertion of net alternative with a double row suture or exercise alone?
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Abdominal Hernias and Other Abdominal Wall Conditions Post-operative Pain Recurrence |
Procedure: Quill suture application for repair or polypropylene mesh |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Prospective Randomized Study to Evaluate Two Different Surgical Methods for Treatment for Abdominal Wall Diastasis |
- Recurrence of diastasis one year post-operatively that indicated by CT scan or clinical investigation. [ Time Frame: follow-up 1 year after surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]All patients go through a CT scan and clinical examination one year after surgery
- adverse event indicated in case report formulary during the first 12 months [ Time Frame: follow-up 1 year after surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]adverse event categorize as superficial wound infection, seroma, fistula or deep wound infection
- Pain post operatively measured by the VHPQ questionnaires [ Time Frame: follow-up 1 year after surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
The validity and reliability of the VHPQ make it a useful tool in assessing postoperative pain and patient satisfaction.
PMID:
22446989 PubMed - as supplied by publisher
| Enrollment: | 96 |
| Study Start Date: | December 2009 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date: | November 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Polypropylene mesh
Reconstruction of the abdominal wall diastasis with insertion of a polypropylene mesh on 30 patients.
|
Procedure: Quill suture application for repair or polypropylene mesh
The first arm may be insertion of the-mesh The second arm may double row- suture The third arm may be conservative -training
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: quill suture
Reconstruction of the abdominal wall diastasis with double row absorbable suture ( Quill Self-retaining system) on 30 patients.
|
Procedure: Quill suture application for repair or polypropylene mesh
The first arm may be insertion of the-mesh The second arm may double row- suture The third arm may be conservative -training
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: conservative treatment
Regular abdominal exercises workout for three months for 30 patients.
|
Procedure: Quill suture application for repair or polypropylene mesh
The first arm may be insertion of the-mesh The second arm may double row- suture The third arm may be conservative -training
Other Names:
|
Detailed Description:
The conservative control group will receive a special training program for abdominal muscle training for 3 months,and all groups wearing girdle for 3 months.
All patients examined with a CT scan before randomization and then a Biodex measurement of abdominal muscle strength.
All patients must also complete the SF-36 (scientifically tested instruments to measure self-reported physical and mental health) and VHPQ (ventral hernia Pain Questionnaire).
Two-thirds of patients receive surgery and followed up with a 3 month and 1-year control.At 1 year of control, all go through a CT scan and a Biodex measurement of muscle strength.
The control group followed up after one and half months and 3 months. In the surgery group, patients may not know what reconstruction they received before the final assessment after 1 year.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Abdominal wall diastasis> 3 cm
- Discomfort or tenderness in the abdominal wall
- Desire for abdominal wall reconstruction
- Women have undergone at least one birth
- Smoking cessation 1 month pre-and 3 months post-operatively
Exclusion Criteria:
- <18 years old
- Ongoing pregnancy
- Ongoing breastfeeding
- Current immunosuppressive therapy
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Peter Emanuelsson, MD, consultant in plastic surgery, Karolinska Institutet |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01586741 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2009/227-31/3/PE/96 |
| Study First Received: | November 21, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | April 25, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Sweden: Regional Ethical Review Board |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Hernia Pain, Postoperative Recurrence Hernia, Abdominal Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
Postoperative Complications Pathologic Processes Pain Signs and Symptoms Disease Attributes |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013