Comparison of Diaphragmatic Breathing and Muscle Relaxation for Rumination
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Rumination is an upper gastrointestinal (GI) disorder characterized by the frequent regurgitation of recently ingested food. Very little is understood about the nature and treatment of this disorder. The act of regurgitation in rumination involves the opening of the upper esophageal sphincter and the muscular contraction of the abdomins rectus. Behavioral treatment of these symptoms is the clinical intervention of choice; however, only uncontrolled case documentation exists to support its effectiveness. However, an effective behavioral mechanism may be relaxation of the muscles. From a behavioral standpoint, muscular relaxation is incompatible with the necessary muscular contraction for rumination.
To date, single case documentation and few designed single case studies have examined the clinical effectiveness of behavioral interventions for GI rumination. In the current study, the investigators seek to examine the effectiveness of two behavioral relaxation interventions for GI rumination through a treatment as usual paradigm (proposed N = 20). Our primary goals are to examine the clinical effectiveness of these interventions in symptom reduction at 1- and 3-month follow-up.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Rumination |
Behavioral: Diaphragmatic breathing Behavioral: Muscle relaxation |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Diaphragmatic Breathing and Progressive Muscle Relaxation: Behavioral Interventions for Gastrointestinal Rumination |
- Rumination Frequency assessed using Rome III Criteria [ Time Frame: 1 month after intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Study participants will be treated with diaphragmatic breathing in one arm and muscle relaxation in the other arm. Outcome measure is:
Rome III Study Questions
Q8: In the last week, how often did food come back up into your mouth?
Q10: When food came back up into your mouth, did it usually stay in your mouth for a while before you swallowed it or spit it out?
- Rumination frequency assessed using Rome III Criteria [ Time Frame: 3 months after intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Study participants will be treated with diaphragmatic breathing in one arm and muscle relaxation in the other arm. Outcome measure is:
Rome III Study Questions
Q8: In the last week, how often did food come back up into your mouth?
Q10: When food came back up into your mouth, did it usually stay in your mouth for a while before you swallowed it or spit it out?
- Heath Care Utilization [ Time Frame: 1 month after intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]How many healthcare visits would you estimate were related to rumination since you started the intervention?
- Short Health Anxiety Inventory (SHAI) [ Time Frame: 1 month post intevention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measure of degree to which intervention has impacted health concerns/anxiety. The SHAI is a validated measure
- Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) [ Time Frame: 1 month after intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]This is a measure of the impact of symptoms on Work, Family, and Social life. Uses a 10 point scale --with categories of mild,moderate severe
- Treatment adherence [ Time Frame: 1 month after intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Following question will be posed: Did you engage in the intervention as you were instructed at your training session? The reponses will be categorized for themes.
- Heath Care Utilization [ Time Frame: 3 month after intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]How many healthcare visits would you estimate were related to rumination since you started the intervention?
- Short Health Anxiety Inventory (SHAI) [ Time Frame: 3 months post intevention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measure of degree to which intervention has impacted health concerns/anxiety. The SHAI is a validated measure
- Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) [ Time Frame: 3 months after intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]This is a measure of the impact of symptoms on Work, Family, and Social life. Uses a 10 point scale --with categories of mild,moderate severe
- Treatment adherence [ Time Frame: 3 months after intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Following question will be posed: Did you engage in the intervention as you were instructed at your training session? The reponses will be categorized for themes.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 20 |
| Study Start Date: | April 2012 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | April 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Diaphragmatic breathing
Training in diaphragmatic breathing as response incompatible with rumination.
|
Behavioral: Diaphragmatic breathing
Patients in this arm will be provided training in diaphragmatic breathing, taught its application in habit-reversal paradigm (to use after eating food and if urge to ruminate).
Behavioral: Muscle relaxation
Progressive passive muscle relaxation
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Muscle relaxation
Patients in this arm of study will be taught muscle relaxation as intervention for rumination, instructed in habit-reversal paradigm to use after eating food or if urge to ruminate
|
Behavioral: Muscle relaxation
Progressive passive muscle relaxation
Other Names:
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion:
- At least 18 years of age.
- Diagnosis of rumination by RomeIII criteria
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active alcohol or substance abuse
- Presence of a depressive disorder as measured by PHQ-9 score of 10 or above
- Presence of clinical significant anxiety disorder as measured by GAD-7 score of 10 or above.
- Severe levels of health focused anxiety as measured by SHAI score of 26 or above.
- Any medical, neurological, or psychiatric condition that would impair the ability to consent and carry out all study procedures.
- Any active psychosis or suicidality.
Contacts and Locations| United States, Minnesota | |
| Mayo Clinic in Rochester | Recruiting |
| Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905 | |
| Contact: Richard J Seime, Ph.D 507-284-2649 seime.richard@mayo.edu | |
| Contact: Jennifer M. Craft, Ph.D. 507 284 5849 craft.jennifer@mayo.edu | |
| Principal Investigator: | Richard Seime, PhD, LP | Mayo Clinic |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Richard J. Seime, PHD, Mayo Clinic |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01576302 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 11-008528 |
| Study First Received: | April 9, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | January 17, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Mayo Clinic:
|
Rumination |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Muscle Hypotonia Neuromuscular Manifestations Neurologic Manifestations Nervous System Diseases Signs and Symptoms |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 21, 2013