Exercise Stress CMR Comparison Study
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This study is being done to compare standard nuclear exercise stress testing to exercise stress magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The investigators have successfully shown that exercise MRI works well in healthy volunteers, and the next step is to test if it works as well as nuclear stress testing in patients with known or suspected heart disease.
MRIs offers superior image quality compared to echocardiography and nuclear imaging, and have the ability to image both function and perfusion. Combining the superior image quality of Cardiac MRI with the diagnostic information provided by exercise stress could result in a new, more accurate modality for diagnosing and evaluating coronary artery disease.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Coronary Artery Disease |
Other: Diagnostic Cardiac Imaging |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Diagnostic |
| Official Title: | Comparison of Exercise MRI and Exercise Nuclear Scintigraphy in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. |
- Diagnosis of coronary artery disease [ Time Frame: baseline ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Cardiac MRI with the diagnostic information provided by exercise stress could result in a new, more accurate modality for diagnosing and evaluating coronary artery disease.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 333 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2007 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | December 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
-
Other: Diagnostic Cardiac Imaging
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- any patient referred for stress SPECT
- known or suspected ischemic heart disease
- ability to perform adequate treadmill stress
Exclusion Criteria:
- any contraindication to MRI (e.g. ferromagnetic foreign body, cerebral aneurysm clip, pacemaker/ICD, severe claustrophobia)
- renal insufficiency (GFR <40)
- known allergy to gadolinium-based contrast or iodinated contrast (because of the research CTA in patients not referred for cath after 2 weeks)
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Debbie Scandling, B.S. | 614-293-2098 | Debbie.scandling@osumc.edu |
| United States, Ohio | |
| Ross Heart Hospital | Recruiting |
| Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Jennifer Dickerson, MD | Ohio State University |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Jennifer Dickerson, Assistant Professor-Clinical, The Ohio State University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01504269 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2007H0132 |
| Study First Received: | January 3, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | May 16, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Coronary Artery Disease Myocardial Ischemia Coronary Disease Heart Diseases |
Cardiovascular Diseases Arteriosclerosis Arterial Occlusive Diseases Vascular Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013