Telmisartan 80mg Non-responder Trial
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
If a patient cannot have his or her blood pressure controlled with telmisartan 80 mg, an antihypertensive drug from different class should be started concomitantly.
In the Japanese 3x3 factorial trial of telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide in essential hypertension patients whose diastolic blood pressure (DBP) are equal or more than 95 mmHg, the DBP control rate (less than 90 mmHg) after 8 weeks treatment of the telmisartan 80 mg monotherapy group (66 patients) was 41.5%. There should be medical needs of the telmisartan 80 mg and amlodipine 5 mg fixed dose combination because some patients cannot have his or her blood pressure controlled with telmisartan 80 mg.
Thus, this clinical trial is being conducted to evaluate the antihypertensive effect and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) drug of 2 antihypertensive agents with different pharmacological effects, telmisartan 80 mg and amlodipine 5 mg (T80/A5 mg), compared with telmisartan 80 mg (T80 mg) monotherapy in Japanese patients with essential hypertension who fail to respond adequately to treatment with the maximum dose of telmisartan 80 mg monotherapy. In this trial, a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel group comparison method is employed.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Hypertension |
Drug: Telmisartan and amlodipine Drug: Telmisartan |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double-Blind Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | An Eight-week Randomised Double-blind Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Telmisartan 80 mg+ Amlodipine 5 mg Fixed-dose Combination vs. Telmisartan 80 mg Monotherapy in Patients With Hypertension Who Fail to Respond Adequately to Treatment With Telmisartan 80 mg Monotherapy |
- Reduction From the Reference Baseline in Mean Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Trough [ Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Reference baseline: Status of patients after the 8-week open-label run-in period with telmisartan monotherapy, where patients' eligibility to enter the double-blind treatment period was examined At trough: 24-hour post-dosing
- Reduction From the Reference Baseline in Mean Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Trough [ Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Reference baseline: Status of patients after the 8-week open-label run-in period with telmisartan monotherapy, where patients' eligibility to enter the double-blind treatment period was examined At trough: 24-hour post-dosing
- Seated DBP Control Rate at Trough [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]DBP control rate: The rate of patients with controlled seated DBP at trough of less than 90 mmHg after the 8-week double-blind period At trough: 24-hour post-dosing
- Seated SBP Control Rate at Trough [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]SBP control rate: The rate of patients with controlled seated SBP at trough of less than 140 mmHg after the 8-week double-blind period At trough: 24-hour post-dosing
- Seated DBP Response Rate at Trough [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]DBP response rate: The rate of patients who achieved an adequate response in seated DBP at trough (<90 mmHg and/or reduction from reference baseline ≥10 mmHg) after the 8-week double-blind period At trough: 24-hour post-dosing
- Seated SBP Response Rate at Trough [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]SBP response rate: The rate of patients who achieved an adequate response in seated SBP at trough (<140 mmHg and/or reduction from reference baseline ≥20 mmHg) after the 8-week double-blind period At trough: 24-hour post-dosing
- Seated Blood Pressure (BP) Normalisation at Trough [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Seated blood pressure (BP) normalisation: The numbers of patients whose blood pressure was within normalisation criterion in terms of seated blood pressure after the 8-week double-blind period At trough: 24-hour post-dosing
| Enrollment: | 174 |
| Study Start Date: | October 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | June 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Telmisartan and amlodipine FDC
once a daily
|
Drug: Telmisartan and amlodipine
Telmisartan 80 mg and amlodipine 5 mg once a daily
|
|
Active Comparator: Telmisartan monotherapy
once a daily
|
Drug: Telmisartan
80 mg once a daily
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 20 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion criteria:
Essential hypertensive patients
- If already taking antihypertensive drugs, mean seated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) must be >=90 and >=114 mmHg
- If not taking any antihypertensive drugs, mean seated DBP must be >=95 and >=114 mmHg
- Able to stop all current antihypertensive drugs without risk to the patient based on the investigators opinion.
Exclusion criteria:
- Patients taking 3 or more antihypertensive drugs at signing the informed consent form
- Patients with known or suspected secondary hypertension
- Patients with clinically relevant cardiac arrhythmia
- Congestive heart failure with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III-IV
- Patients with recent cardiovascular events
- Patients with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack within last 6 months before signing the informed consent form
- Patients with a history of sudden deterioration of renal function with angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors; or patients with post-renal transplant or post-nephrectomy
- Patients who have previously experienced characteristic symptoms of angioedema (such as facial, tongue, pharyngeal, or laryngeal swelling with dyspnea) during treatment with ARBs or ACE inhibitors
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to any component of the investigational product, or a known hypersensitivity to dihydropyridine-derived drugs
- Patients with hepatic and/or renal dysfunction
- Pre-menopausal women who are nursing or pregnant
Contacts and Locations| Japan | |
| 1235.36.01 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Chuo-ku,Tokyo, Japan | |
| 1235.36.04 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan | |
| 1235.36.02 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan | |
| 1235.36.03 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Suita, Osaka, Japan | |
| Study Chair: | Boehringer Ingelheim | Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals |
More Information
Additional Information:
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01222520 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 1235.36 |
| Study First Received: | October 15, 2010 |
| Results First Received: | May 31, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | July 23, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Japan: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Hypertension Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Amlodipine Telmisartan Benzoates Calcium Channel Blockers Membrane Transport Modulators Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Pharmacologic Actions Cardiovascular Agents |
Therapeutic Uses Vasodilator Agents Antihypertensive Agents Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors Protease Inhibitors Enzyme Inhibitors Antifungal Agents Anti-Infective Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013