A Comparative Study of the Air-Q ILA and the ILMA for Ventilation and Intubation
This study has suspended participant recruitment.
(Study never initiated.)
Sponsor:
Capital District Health Authority, Canada
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Orlando Hung, Capital District Health Authority, Canada
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01209559
First received: September 23, 2010
Last updated: October 31, 2011
Last verified: October 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The objective of this study is to determine if the glottic view obtained with the air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (air-Q ILA, Cookgas LLC®, Mercury Medical®, Clearwater, FL, USA) is better than that obtained with the traditionally used intubating laryngeal mask airway (LMA FastrachTM or ILMA, LMA North America Inc., San Diego, CA). The study will also compare effectiveness of ventilation.
| Condition |
|---|
|
Airway Management |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Prospective |
Further study details as provided by Capital District Health Authority, Canada:
| Estimated Enrollment: | 60 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2011 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2011 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | December 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Groups/Cohorts |
|---|
| air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway |
| LMA FastrachTM or ILMA |
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Probability Sample |
Study Population
Healthy ASA class I and II patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring the use of the LMA.
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- healthy ASA class I and II patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring the use of the LMA
Exclusion Criteria:
- history of acid reflux,
- a BMI ≥ 40kg.m-2,
- require endotracheal intubation,
- have predictors of difficult intubation,
- not candidates for insertion of an ILMA or LMA, including a mouth opening of less than 2.5 cm,
- cannot consent to the study
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Orlando Hung, MD FRCPC, Capital District Health Authority, Canada |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01209559 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CDHA-RS/2011-156 |
| Study First Received: | September 23, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | October 31, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Canada: Health Canada |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013