Humanalbumin, Hydroxyethylstarch and Ringer Lactate During Cardiac Surgery
The recruitment status of this study is unknown because the information has not been verified recently.
Verified August 2010 by Medical University of Vienna.
Recruitment status was Active, not recruiting
Recruitment status was Active, not recruiting
Sponsor:
Medical University of Vienna
Information provided by:
Medical University of Vienna
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01174719
First received: August 2, 2010
Last updated: August 10, 2010
Last verified: August 2010
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The aim of the study is to compare three different regimens for volume replacement during cardiac surgery, e.g. Albumin 5%, Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 (HES) and Ringer-Lactate (RL).
Main Outcome parameters: chest tube drainage and coagulation parameters. The investigators hypothesis is that HES is as safe as Albumin, however less expensive. Whether RL is an even less expensive and as safe alternative has to be shown.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac Surgery Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Valve Replacement |
Drug: volume replacement Drug: Humanalbumin 5% |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Phase 4 Study Comparing Albumin 5%, Hydroxyethylstrach 130/0.4 (6%) and Ringer Lactate for Volume Replacement During Cardiac Surgery |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Medical University of Vienna:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- chest tube drainage [ Time Frame: 24 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Hemoglobin concentration [ Time Frame: induction of anesthesia = baseline ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Hematocrit value [ Time Frame: induction of anesthesia = baseline ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- platelet count [ Time Frame: induction of anesthesia = baseline ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- activated clotting time [ Time Frame: induction of anesthesia = baseline ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Modified thromboelastometry coagulation analysis (ROTEM, Pentapharm, Munich, Germany) [ Time Frame: induction of anethesia = baseline ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]using 3 activators: intrinsic ROTEM (InTEM, extrinsic ROTEM (ExTEM), finbrinogen ROTEM (FibTEM)
- Hemoglobin concentration [ Time Frame: average 1 hour on cardiopulmonary bypass ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Hematocrit value [ Time Frame: average 1 hour on cardiopulmonary bypass ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Modified thromboelastometry coagulation analysis (ROTEM, Pentapharm, Munich, Germany) [ Time Frame: average 1 hour on cardiopulmonary bypass ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]using 3 activators: intrinsic ROTEM (InTEM, extrinsic ROTEM (ExTEM), finbrinogen ROTEM (FibTEM)
- activated clotting time [ Time Frame: average 1 hour on cardiopulmonary bypass ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Hemoglobin concentration [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after arrival ICU ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Hematocrit value [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after arrival ICU ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- platelet count [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after arrival ICU ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- activated clotting time [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after arrival ICU ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Modified thromboelastometry coagulation analysis (ROTEM, Pentapharm, Munich, Germany) [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after arrival ICU ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]using 3 activators: intrinsic ROTEM (InTEM, extrinsic ROTEM (ExTEM), finbrinogen ROTEM (FibTEM)
- Hemoglobin concentration [ Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Hematocrit value [ Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- platelet count [ Time Frame: 24 hrs after surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Modified thromboelastometry coagulation analysis (ROTEM, Pentapharm, Munich, Germany) [ Time Frame: 24 hrs after surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]using 3 activators: intrinsic ROTEM (InTEM, extrinsic ROTEM (ExTEM), finbrinogen ROTEM (FibTEM)
| Enrollment: | 240 |
| Study Start Date: | March 2006 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | June 2011 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | December 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Active Comparator: Hydroxyethylstarch |
Drug: volume replacement
Hydroxyethylstarch up to 50mL/kg/24 hrs
Other Names:
|
| Active Comparator: Humanalbumin |
Drug: Humanalbumin 5%
Humanalbumin 5% up to 50 mL/kg/24 hours
Other Name: Humanalbumin 5% Baxter
|
| Active Comparator: Ringer lactate |
Drug: volume replacement
up 10 50mL/kg/24 hours
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 20 Years to 80 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Valve replacement
- Coronary bypass surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe left ventricular dysfunction
- Coagulation disorders
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Eva Maria Base, Associate Professor, Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01174719 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | HAHes |
| Study First Received: | August 2, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | August 10, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | Austria: Agency for Health and Food Safety |
Keywords provided by Medical University of Vienna:
|
Hydroxyethylstarch Humanalbumin Ringer Lactate patients undergoing cardiac surgery |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Hetastarch Plasma Substitutes Blood Substitutes |
Hematologic Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013