Selective Exposure in HIV Prevention
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Unfortunately, people most at risk for HIV are the least likely to enroll and remain in prevention programs. In our past work, we have learned how to increase enrollment in such programs among this group. We have identified and addressed previously ignored gender-specific and client self-validation issues that conventional interventions often leave not only uncontrolled, but often biased against participation. The present work will extend these methods from enrollment to retention.
We intend to recruit a sample of 656 at-risk participants through our collaboration with the Duval County, FL Health Department for our randomized, double-blind trial. Our study will investigate if a meta-intervention video designed for empowering participants as agents of their own change can increase the number of attended sessions relative to a control condition without such a video. This trial will also determine if a meta-intervention video addressing various emotional/social and instrumental benefits of an HIV-prevention-counseling intervention can also increase the number of attended sessions. These two factors will be crossed, and their effects on retention will be estimated for different genders and ethnicities. Effects on clients' attention to the return sessions as reported by the counselor will also be explored among participants who return.
We will also conduct mediator analyses for investigating if the meta-intervention has mediating influences on corresponding expectations about the return counseling session. As the inclusion of meta-cognitive measures can alter the efficacy of the intervention, half of the sample will receive measures immediately (0-10 minutes) after exposure to the meta-intervention, before attendance to the next session is registered. The other half will not complete these measures.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
HIV Infections |
Other: Instrumental meta intervention Other: Empowering meta-intervention Other: Control |
Phase 2 Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver) Primary Purpose: Prevention |
| Official Title: | Study to Test Meta-intervention to Increase Retention in HIV Prevention Counseling |
- Enrollment [ Time Frame: 1 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]return rate for 2 upcoming sessions
- Perceptions of the counselor [ Time Frame: 0-10 minutes ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Questionnaire measures of perceptions of the counseling session
| Estimated Enrollment: | 760 |
| Study Start Date: | May 2010 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | April 2017 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | April 2017 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Control with stories
Basic awareness messages with stories of people living with AIDS
|
Other: Control
Control messages to increase awareness of HIV risk
|
|
Experimental: Instrumental
Instrumental messages with stories of people living with HIV
|
Other: Instrumental meta intervention
30 min video with stories of people with HIV. Content describes general health and emotional benefits of counseling.
|
|
Experimental: Empowering
Empowering messages with stories of people living with HIV
|
Other: Empowering meta-intervention
Empowering 30 min video with stories of people living with AIDS. Emphasizes individual control over behavior change.
|
|
Experimental: Instrumental and Empowering
Instrumental and empowering messages with stories of people living with HIV
|
Other: Instrumental meta intervention
30 min video with stories of people with HIV. Content describes general health and emotional benefits of counseling.
Other: Empowering meta-intervention
Empowering 30 min video with stories of people living with AIDS. Emphasizes individual control over behavior change.
|
|
Active Comparator: Basic Control
Basic awareness messages with stories of people who are not infected with HIV
|
Other: Control
Control messages to increase awareness of HIV risk
|
Detailed Description:
- After the Informed Consent is signed, the research assistant supervises administration of the baseline questionnaire via ACASI. In ACASI, the questions are seen on the computer screen and heard through earphones simultaneously. This technique has been shown to enhance the accuracy of any reported non-normative behavior by the relative privacy and anonymity it affords. It is expected to take about 30 minutes.
- Participants are seen for one-on-one HIV counseling for approximately 20 minutes by counselors briefed to the study according to the protocol described in the attached document "Scripts Florida Study.doc" (hereinafter "the Scripts document").
- After the counseling session, participants will watch a 20-minute video delivering one of the experimental or control meta-intervention messages, which are more fully described in the Scripts document.
- The self-reporting of expectations and intentions that we need to elicit at this point may have a confounding effect on the retention that the study hopes to measure. Therefore, half of the participants will skip the next step and half will complete it, to allow us to assess the actual effect of this self-report measure on retention while studying if these measures mediate retention.
- The half of the participants reporting expectations will report their expectations and intentions for further counseling, via a 10-minute ACASI questionnaire. The questionnaire is designed to distinguish the dimensions of social/emotional, instrumental and empowering expectations.
- At the end of the first 70-80 minute session, the counselor schedules the follow-up appointments.
- Customary phone reminders are issued two days before each 20-minute follow-up session, as is routine for medical and counseling appointments.
The study counselor does the following at each follow-up session:
- Records the participant's attendance or absence on the Counselor's Questionnaire.
- For attending participants, the study counselor rates their attention to the counseling on the Counselor's Questionnaire.
- The RA in charge of video presentation rates attention to the videos.
- At the end of the second session, the study counselor double-checks the third appointment with the participant, and reschedules if necessary.
- A detailed description of the two follow-up sessions is found in the attached document titled "Counselor Guidelines (2nd and 3rd sessions). The questions and statements therein will be delivered and answered verbally.
- At the end of the third session, participants who did not answer the questionnaire in Step 5 will answer a similar questionnaire about their reactions to the meta-intervention video.
- All participants will be fully debriefed. Non-attendees will be called and debriefed either by phone or in person based on their preferences.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 35 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Sexually active,
- Low condom use,
- Low intention to use condom
Exclusion Criteria:
- Trying to get pregnant
- HIV positive
- with contaminant knowledge about the study
- planning to leave the area
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Dolores Albarracin, PhD | 217 244 7019 | dalbarra@illinois.edu |
| Contact: Marta Durantini, PhD | mrdurant@illinois.edu |
| United States, Florida | |
| Duval County Health Department | Recruiting |
| Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32211 | |
| Principal Investigator: William Livingood, PhD | |
| Principal Investigator: | Dolores Albarracin, PhD | University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Dolores Albarracin, Professor, University of Illinois |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01152281 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | selectiveexposure |
| Study First Received: | May 28, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | June 28, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign:
|
retention attrition empowering reactance motivational goals |
Basic control Control with stories of people with AIDS Instrumental Empowering Instrumental and Empowering |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
HIV Infections Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Lentivirus Infections Retroviridae Infections RNA Virus Infections Virus Diseases |
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral Sexually Transmitted Diseases Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes Immune System Diseases Slow Virus Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013