Volar Locked Plating Versus Bridging External Fixation
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
A randomized, prospective comparison of volar locked plating versus Hoffman II bridging external fixation supplemented by K-wire fixation in patients with comminuted distal radius fractures, AO/OTA type C2 & C3.
Hypothesis:
There is no significant difference in using volar plates compared to Hoffman II bridging external fixation supplemented by K-wire fixation in patients with comminuted distal radius fractures, AO/OTA type C2 & C3 as evaluated by a Quick-DASH score at 24 months follow-up.
| Condition |
|---|
|
Distal Radius Fracture |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Observational Model: Case Control Time Perspective: Prospective |
- Quick-DASH [ Time Frame: 2 year follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 140 |
| Study Start Date: | September 2009 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | March 2014 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | March 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
We have designed a randomized, prospective study for comparison of volar locked plating versus Hoffman II bridging external fixation supplemented by K-wire fixation in patients with comminuted distal radius fractures, AO/OTA type C2 & C3. On the basis of power analysis a total of 140 patients are to be included in this project. The follow-up period is 2 years and evaluation is based on x-ray analysis, grip strength, range of movement, pain and various tools to measure quality of life and satisfaction with the treatment (EQ-5d, SF-36, Quick-DASH).
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 70 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Probability Sample |
All patients between the age of 18 and 70 diagnosed with a C2- or C3-type fracture
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients admitted to Ahus and Lillestrom legevakt with a distal radius fracture are to be classified according to the system of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA).
- All patients between the age of 18 and 70 diagnosed with a C2- or C3-type fracture, or a dislocated C1-fracture, are eligible for inclusion.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Gustillo-Anderson type III open fractures
- Previous distal radius/ulna-fracture and/or disabling hand injury of the same extremity
- Dementia
- Congenital anomaly
- Bilateral radius fracture
- Pathological fracture other than osteoporotic fracture
- Congenital bone disease (for example osteogenesis imperfecta)
- Age below 18 and above 70
- Disabling nury to other parts og the movement apparatus at the same time as the current injury
Contacts and Locations| Norway | |
| Akershus University Hospital | Recruiting |
| Sykehusveien 25, Nordbyhagen, Lorenskog, Norway, 1478 | |
| Contact: Ola-Lars Hammer, MD +47 94179767 oham@ahus.no | |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Jan Erik Madsen, Ph.D., University of Oslo |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01062997 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | S-09101a 2009/2172 |
| Study First Received: | February 4, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | February 4, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | The National Committees for Research Ethics: Norway |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Radius Fractures Forearm Injuries Arm Injuries Wounds and Injuries Fractures, Bone |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013