Anticipation of the Difficult Airway: the Preoperative Airway Assessment Form
Recruitment status was Active, not recruiting
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to see if our experimental preoperative airway assessment form is a better indicator of difficult airway as compared to the anesthesia record that is presently used.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Endotracheal Intubation Risk Assessment |
Other: Preoperative assessment form |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Diagnostic |
| Official Title: | Anticipation of the Difficult Airway: the Preoperative Airway Assessment Form as an Educational and Quality Improvement Tool |
- Use of an experimental preoperative assessment form by residents will result in more complete documentation of important airway features compared to use of the current forms [ Time Frame: interim analysis will be assessed after 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- use of the experimental preoperative assessment form will result in greater resident recognition of patients at high risk for a difficult airway as judged independently by one of 3 senior faculty investigators. [ Time Frame: interim analyses will be assessed after 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- the percentage of patients intubated using an awake method will be greater among residents using the new form than those using the current form [ Time Frame: interim analysis will be assessed after 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- the percentage of patients requiring multiple intubation attempts or use of invasive airway techniques will be lower among residents using the new form. [ Time Frame: interim analysis will be assessed after 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- spontaneous knowledge of important airway features will be more complete among residents using the new form at 18 months of training. [ Time Frame: interim analysis will be assessed after 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- observations made during this study will allow refinement of the new form to augment the identification of patients with difficult airway. [ Time Frame: interim analysis will be assessed after 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Enrollment: | 89 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2008 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | February 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Difficult Airway Assessment Form |
Other: Preoperative assessment form
(based on the american society of anesthesiologists)components of the form include: neck measurements; neck mobility; mallampati; wilson's test; pre-existing conditions; and predictions of difficult mask ventilation, supraglottic airway, laryngoscopy, intubation, and surgical airway.
|
Detailed Description:
Predicting difficult airway continues to be problematic for even the most seasoned of anesthesiologists. In our study, the resident class will be our sample population. The residents will be randomly assigned into two groups: the experimental group will be utilizing the new preoperative airway assessment form and the control group will be utilizing the standard anesthesia record. Simultaneously, a subset of our anesthesia experts will also be assessing patients preoperatively. The five areas of difficult airway management will be considered: difficult mask ventilation, difficult supraglottic airway, difficult laryngoscopy, difficult intubation, and difficult surgical airway.
According to the American Society of Anesthesiologists, the incidence of intubation has remained stable throughout the 1980s and 1990s despite attempts to predict its occurrence. Many of these cases were considered to be preventable; therefore, a better prediction of and preparation for difficult airway management may lead to a reduction in adverse events.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- CA-1, CA-2, and CA-3 anesthesiology residents starting from July 2008-July 2010
Exclusion Criteria:
- the same anesthesiology residents who are working with patients 17 and younger, patients who are already intubated, and patients undergoing emergent surgery.
Contacts and Locations| United States, Texas | |
| Memorial Hermann Hospital, Medical Center | |
| Houston, Texas, United States, 77030 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Carin A Hagberg, MD | University of Texas at Houston Health Science Center, Medical School |
More Information
Additional Information:
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Carin Hagberg, University of Texas at Houston Medical school |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01037374 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 07-0144 |
| Study First Received: | December 21, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | January 5, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston:
|
risk assessment difficult endotracheal intubation |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013