Adaptive Treatment for Cocaine Dependence
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Primary objective #1: Determine the relative effectiveness of MI-IOP and MI-PC in the full study sample with regard to treatment engagement over weeks 1-12 and cocaine use over weeks 1-24.
- Hypothesis 1: An intervention that explores several possible treatment options with the patient and provides the chosen option (e.g., MI-PC) will produce higher rates of treatment engagement than an intervention focused on engagement in IOP only (e.g., MI-IOP).
- Hypothesis 2: An intervention that explores several possible treatment options with the patient and provides the chosen option (e.g., MI-PC) will produce better cocaine use outcomes than an intervention focused on engagement in IOP only (MI-IOP).
- Secondary analysis 1: Among the Non-engaged patients, determine rates of selection of each of the three options in MI-PC, retention rates within each option, and cocaine use outcomes in each option.
- Secondary analysis 2: Among the Engaged patients, determine rates of selection of each of the three options in MI-PC, retention rates within each option, and cocaine use outcomes in each option.
Primary objective #2: Determine whether the relative effectiveness of MI-IOP and MI-PC varies as a function of engagement group, with regard to treatment engagement over weeks 1-12 and cocaine use outcomes over weeks 1-24.
- Hypothesis 1: The predicted main effect on retention favoring MI-PC over MI-IOP will be significantly larger among patients in the Non-engaged group than among those in the Engaged group.
- Hypothesis 2: The predicted main effect on cocaine use outcomes favoring MI-PC over MI-IOP will be significantly larger among patients in the Non-engaged group than among those in the Engaged group.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Cocaine Dependence |
Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing Behavioral: Telephone counseling Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Counseling |
Phase 2 Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Adaptive Treatment for Cocaine Dependence |
- Determine the relative effectiveness of MI-IOP and MI-PC in the full study sample with regard to treatment engagement over weeks 1-12 and cocaine use over weeks 1-24. [ Time Frame: engagment measured to week 12, cocaine use measured to week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Determine whether the relative effectiveness of MI-IOP and MI-PC varies as a function of engagement group, with regard to treatment engagement over weeks 1-12 and cocaine use outcomes over weeks 1-24. [ Time Frame: Engagement measured until week 12, cocaine use measured until week 24. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 300 |
| Study Start Date: | October 2008 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2013 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | December 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
1-MI-IOP Engaged
Randomized to treatment as usual, and they attend regularly.
|
Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing
2 sessions at week 2, potential 2 sessions at week 8 if the participant drops out.
Other Name: MI
|
|
Experimental: 2-MI-IOP Non-Engaged
Randomized to treatment as usual, and do not attend.
|
Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing
2 sessions at week 2, potential 2 sessions at week 8 if the participant drops out.
Other Name: MI
Behavioral: Telephone counseling
one telephone counseling session per week for 10 weeks.
Other Name: Telephone based stepped care.
Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Counseling
One CBT session per week, for 10 weeks.
Other Name: CBT
|
|
3-MI-PC Engaged
Randomized to treatment choice, but remain attending treatment as usual.
|
Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing
2 sessions at week 2, potential 2 sessions at week 8 if the participant drops out.
Other Name: MI
Behavioral: Telephone counseling
one telephone counseling session per week for 10 weeks.
Other Name: Telephone based stepped care.
Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Counseling
One CBT session per week, for 10 weeks.
Other Name: CBT
|
|
Experimental: 4-MI-PC
Randomized to treatment choice, and do not attend treatment as usual, so the choice option is used.
|
Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing
2 sessions at week 2, potential 2 sessions at week 8 if the participant drops out.
Other Name: MI
Behavioral: Telephone counseling
one telephone counseling session per week for 10 weeks.
Other Name: Telephone based stepped care.
Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Counseling
One CBT session per week, for 10 weeks.
Other Name: CBT
|
Detailed Description:
3. Secondary objective #1: Examine outcomes on three secondary measures: percent days abstinent from all substances, negative consequences of drug use, and HIV high risk behaviors.
Hypothesis 1: Outcomes on the secondary measures will be better in MI-PC than in MI-IOP.
4. Secondary objective #2: Test hypotheses concerning potential mediators of the predicted main effect favoring MI-PC over MI-IOP.
Hypothesis 1: The predicted advantage of MI-PC over MI-IOP will be mediated by greater increases in motivation, self-efficacy, commitment to abstinence, and self-help involvement in MI-PC.
5. Secondary objective #3: Test hypotheses concerning effect of additional MI intervention after initial non-engagement persists through 12 weeks.
- Hypothesis 1: A second telephone MI intervention will produce higher rates of subsequent engagement and less cocaine use than no further MI.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Female |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- meet DSM-IV criteria for lifetime cocaine dependence and have used cocaine in the prior 6 months;
- be > 18 years of age;
- be judged clinically appropriate for IOP (e.g., no current psychotic disorder or evidence of severe dementia, and no acute medical problem requiring inpatient treatment;
- have no regular IV heroin use during the past year;
- have access to a telephone;
- be willing to be randomized and participate in research; and
- no current participation in methadone or other forms of DA treatment, other than IOP. Finally, because of study follow-up requirements, subjects will
- be required to be metropolitan area residents, and
- be able to provide the name, verified telephone number, and address of at least two contacts who can provide locator information on the patient during follow-up. We will include patients with dependence on other substances, provided that they are cocaine dependent and meet other inclusion criteria.
Exclusion Criteria:
- have a current psychotic disorder (as assessed with the psychotic screen from the MINI) or evidence of dementia severe enough to prevent participation in outpatient treatment;
- have acute medical problem requiring immediate inpatient treatment; or
- are currently participating in methadone or other forms of DA treatment, other than IOP.
Contacts and Locations| United States, Pennsylvania | |
| Presbyterian Medical Center | |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104 | |
| NorthEast Treatment Center | |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19123 | |
| VAMC | |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104 | |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | James R. McKay, Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01032135 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 807092, IND: 101,486 |
| Study First Received: | December 14, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | August 3, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Cocaine-Related Disorders Substance-Related Disorders Mental Disorders |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013