Left Ventricular Lead Position in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Left ventricular (LV) lead position has crucial impact on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) success. This study will compare fluoroscopy and myocardial deformation imaging for optimal definition of LV lead position.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Heart Failure |
Procedure: Implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy device Procedure: Echocardiography (myocardial deformation imaging) |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Time Perspective: Retrospective |
| Official Title: | Optimal Definition of Left Ventricular Lead Position in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Myocardial Deformation Imaging |
- Improvement in LV function and LV remodelling [ Time Frame: 6 to 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 55 |
| Groups/Cohorts | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
A1
heart failure patients undergoing CRT implantation
|
Procedure: Implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy device Procedure: Echocardiography (myocardial deformation imaging) |
Detailed Description:
In a 16 segment model circumferential strain will be used to determine the segment with latest peak systolic circumferential strain prior to CRT, considered as the optimal LV lead target. LV lead will be defined by (1) fluoroscopy, (2) the maximal temporal difference of peak circumferential strain before-to-on CRT and (3) the earliest peak systolic circumferential strain during LV pacing. For all 3 modalities optimal LV lead position is defined as concordance or immediate neighbouring of the segment with defined LV lead position to the determined optimal target segment. At follow-up echocardiography will be performed to determine improvement in LV function and remodeling.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Probability Sample |
Consecutive patients with end-stage heart failure and sinus rhythm, scheduled for new implantation of a biventricular pacemaker were included in the study. Criteria for CRT implantation were New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III (N=35) or IV (N=21) despite optimal pharmacologic therapy and evidence of LV systolic dysfunction with ejection fraction <35% and a QRS >120ms.
Inclusion Criteria:
- See above
- Males and females
- Ages 18 to 80 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who already have had a pacemaker device
- Patients with poor echocardiographic window
- Patients who are not able to understand the study and to give informed written consent
Contacts and Locations| Germany | |
| Department of Cardiology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital | |
| Aachen, Germany, 52057 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Michael Becker, MD | RWTH Aachen University Hospital |
| Study Chair: | Rainer Hoffmann, MD | RWTH Aachen University Hospital |
More Information
Publications:
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00748735 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | MB-2008-CRT |
| Study First Received: | September 7, 2008 |
| Last Updated: | September 8, 2008 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Ethics Commission |
Keywords provided by RWTH Aachen University:
|
cardiac resynchronization therapy echocardiography heart failure left ventricular function |
pacing myocardial deformation imaging Optimal Definition of Left Ventricular Lead Position in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Heart Failure Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013