Comparison of Acceleromyography (AMG) and Mechanomyography (MMG) for Establishing Potency of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Information provided by:
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00660413
First received: April 15, 2008
Last updated: NA
Last verified: April 2008
History: No changes posted
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to compare two methods for neuromuscular monitoring, acceleromyography and mechanomyography for establishing the dose-response relationship and the potency of a neuromuscular blocking agent using rocuronium as an example. We hypothesized that there would be no significant difference between potencies estimated using acceleromyography and mechanomyography.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Neuromuscular Blockade |
Device: TOF-Watch SX (Acceleromyography) |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Pharmacodynamics Study Masking: Single Blind Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Comparison of Acceleromyography and Mechanomyography for Establishing Potency of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents, A Randomized Controlled Study |
Further study details as provided by Rigshospitalet, Denmark:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Comparison of ED50 with the two methods
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Comparison of ED95 with the two methods
| Enrollment: | 40 |
| Study Start Date: | December 2007 |
| Study Completion Date: | February 2008 |
| Primary Completion Date: | February 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: AMG
Acceleromygraphy monitoring
|
Device: TOF-Watch SX (Acceleromyography)
Randomization of AMG to dominant or non-dominant arm. MMG at contralateral arm.
|
|
Active Comparator: MMG
Mechanomyography monitoring
|
Device: TOF-Watch SX (Acceleromyography)
Randomization of AMG to dominant or non-dominant arm. MMG at contralateral arm.
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA I-III
- Ideal weight +/-20%
- Both arms available for neuromuscular monitoring
- Surgery in supine position
- Participated surgery time more than 30 min
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant and breast-feeding women
- Patients with known illness or use of medications known to influence the neuromuscular transmission
- Known significant renal or hepatic dysfunction
- Allergy to medications used in the study
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00660413 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | AMG-MMG D-R |
| Study First Received: | April 15, 2008 |
| Last Updated: | April 15, 2008 |
| Health Authority: | Denmark: Danish Dataprotection Agency |
Keywords provided by Rigshospitalet, Denmark:
|
Acceleromyography Mechanomyography Neuromuscular block Neuromuscular monitoring |
Dose-response Potency Rocuronium |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Neuromuscular Blocking Agents Neuromuscular Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013