Paravertebral Blocks: Pilot Study to Compare Nerve Stimulation vs. Anatomic Landmarks in Inguinal Hernia Repair (PVB)
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Mayo Clinic
Information provided by:
Mayo Clinic
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00587704
First received: December 21, 2007
Last updated: February 22, 2010
Last verified: February 2010
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Primary aim:
1. To compare the nerve stimulation vs. anatomic techniques of paravertebral block of T11-L1 in providing surgical anesthesia for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.
Secondary aims:
- Compare VAS pain scores in the two groups of patients over the first 24 hours.
- Compare opioid intake over the first 24 hours in the two groups of patients.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Inguinal Hernia |
Procedure: PVB using nerve stimulation Procedure: PVB using anatomic landmarks |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Supportive Care |
| Official Title: | Paravertebral Blocks Techniques: A Pilot Study to Compare Nerve Stimulation vs. Anatomic Landmarks for Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Genetics Home Reference related topics:
abdominal wall defect
MedlinePlus related topics:
Hernia
U.S. FDA Resources
Further study details as provided by Mayo Clinic:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Successful full block at T11-L1 [ Time Frame: Every 10 minutes until full block achieved ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 50 |
| Study Start Date: | July 2007 |
| Study Completion Date: | May 2009 |
| Primary Completion Date: | May 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Nerve Stimulation
Use of nerve stimulator for placement of PVB nerve block
|
Procedure: PVB using nerve stimulation
5ml of 1% ropivacaine injected incrementally
|
|
Anatomic landmarks
Use of anatomic landmarks for placement of PVB block
|
Procedure: PVB using anatomic landmarks
5ml of 1% ropivacaine injected incrementally
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Unilateral open inguinal herniorrhaphy
- Patient must be >18 years of age
- ASA physical status of I, II, or III
- Patient competent to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient < 18 years of age
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Patient unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
- Contraindications to regional anesthesia
- Allergy to amide local anesthetics
Contacts and Locations
More Information
Additional Information:
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Steven R. Clendenen, M.D., Mayo Clinic |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00587704 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 07-002759 |
| Study First Received: | December 21, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | February 22, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Hernia Hernia, Inguinal Pathological Conditions, Anatomical Hernia, Abdominal |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013