Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Micropulse 810 Nanomolar (nm), Diode Laser for Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified by Federal University of São Paulo, May 2008
First Received: October 31, 2007   Last Updated: May 6, 2008   History of Changes
Sponsor: Federal University of São Paulo
Information provided by: Federal University of São Paulo
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00552435
  Purpose

Objective: To compare micropulse 810nm diode laser photocoagulation versus argon laser photocoagulation for treatment of diabetic macular edema. Micropulse laser technique will be determined by an initial clinical trial comparing single versus double density laser photocoagulation techniques for treatment of diabetic macular edema.The single density is based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grid photocoagulation technique and the double density increases the number of spots.

Methods: Patients with diabetic macular edema will be assigned to receive either micropulse 810nm diode laser photocoagulation or argon laser photocoagulation therapy. First, in a smaller clinical trial, patients will be assigned to single or double density micropulse 810nm diode laser to determine best strategy for this therapy. Visual acuity, fundus photographs and fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography measurements , autofluorescence and mfERG were obtained at baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months and 12 months.


Condition Intervention Phase
Diabetic Macular Edema
Device: Laser photocoagulation
Phase II

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind (Subject), Active Control, Parallel Assignment
Official Title: Phase 2 Study of Micropulse 810nm Diode Laser Photocoagulation for Treatment of Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by Federal University of São Paulo:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Macular thickness measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Safety profile [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Selectivity of laser therapy (autofluorescence and mfERG) [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]

Estimated Enrollment: 50
Study Start Date: March 2007
Estimated Study Completion Date: November 2008
Estimated Primary Completion Date: November 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
1: Experimental
Micropulse 810nm diode laser
Device: Laser photocoagulation
Laser therapy is applied using a slit lamp and specific laser contact lens.
2: Active Comparator
Argon laser photocoagulation
Device: Laser photocoagulation
Laser therapy is applied using a slit lamp and specific laser contact lens.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetes mellitus (type 1 or 2)
  • Diabetic macular edema in study eye associated to diabetic retinopathy
  • Diffuse macular edema defined as macular thickening determined by biomicroscopy and fluorescein angiography.
  • Best corrected visual acuity between 34 (20/200) and 68 letters (20/50).
  • Macular thickness greater than 300 mcm on OCT.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled systemic disease
  • Start of medical therapy for diabetes or change in treatment from oral to insulin four months before initial visit.
  • HbA1c levels greater than 10%
  • Presence of retinal venous occlusion, cystoid macular edema,or other condition that would contribute to macular edema.
  • Presence of epiretinal membrane
  • Presence of vitreomacular traction in the study eye.
  • Neovascularization of disc or elsewhere in the study eye.
  • History or presence of choroidal neovascularization in the study eye.
  • Presence of rubeosis irides in the study eye.
  • Eye opacity that interfere with clinical documentation and photography.
  • Intra-ocular surgery 90 days before initial visit.
  • Scheduled surgery for study eye.
  • Patients with known allergies to fluorescein.
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00552435

Contacts
Contact: Daniel Lavinsky 55-11-7658-8669 lavinsky@via-rs.net
Contact: Jose A Cardillo 55-16-8115-1000 hospitaldeolhos@uol.com.br

Locations
Brazil, SP
Vision Institute, Federal University of Sao Paulo Recruiting
Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Contact: Daniel Lavinsky, MD     55-11-7658-8669        
Principal Investigator: Jose A Cardillo            
Principal Investigator: Michel E Farah            
Sub-Investigator: Paulo Hilarião            
Sub-Investigator: Leonardo Castro            
Sub-Investigator: Daniel Lavinsky            
Sponsors and Collaborators
Federal University of São Paulo
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Jose A Cardillo Federal University of Sao Paulo- Department of Ophthalmology
  More Information

No publications provided

Responsible Party: Vision Institute Department of Ophthalmology ( Federal University of Sao Paulo )
Study ID Numbers: MP-001
Study First Received: October 31, 2007
Last Updated: May 6, 2008
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00552435     History of Changes
Health Authority: Brazil: National Committee of Ethics in Research;   Brazil: National Health Surveillance Agency

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Signs and Symptoms
Macular Edema
Eye Diseases
Retinal Degeneration
Macular Degeneration
Edema
Retinal Diseases

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on November 09, 2009