ClinicalTrials.gov
 Home    Search    Study Topics    Glossary  
 

  Full Text View  
  Tabular View  
  Contacts and Locations  
  No Study Results Posted  
  Related Studies  
A Study Of Tanezumab as Add-On Therapy to Opioid Medication In Patients With Pain Due To Cancer That Has Spread To Bone

This study is not yet open for participant recruitment.
Verified by Pfizer, November 2008

Sponsored by: Pfizer
Information provided by: Pfizer
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00545129
  Purpose

The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of tanezumab in comination with opioids in treating pain due to cancer that has spread to bone.


Condition Intervention Phase
Palliative Care
Neoplasm Metastasis
Drug: Tanezumab 10 mg IV
Drug: IV Placebo for tanezumab
Phase II

MedlinePlus related topics:   Cancer    Palliative Care   

Drug Information available for:   BaseLine   

U.S. FDA Resources

Study Type:   Interventional
Study Design:   Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Official Title:   Phase II Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Efficacy And Safety Study Of Tanezumab As Add-On Therapy To Opioid Medication In Patients With Pain Due To Bone Metastases

Further study details as provided by Pfizer:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Change from Baseline to Week 6 in daily average pain intensity measured by the 11 point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10). Baseline is the average daily Pain NRS score during Stabilization Phase prior to Randomization (3 days). [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Average number of doses of rescue medication required per week (up to Week 16). [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Clinical laboratory assessments (hematology, blood chemistry, PT/PTT, urinalysis) at Screening, Baseline, and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 12 and 16 (or at early termination). [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Physical examination at Screening, Week 6 and Week 16 (or at early termination). [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Weight measurements at Screening, Week 6 and Week 16 (or at early termination). [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Time to a ≥30% reduction from Baseline in the daily average pain intensity NRS score (sustained for a minimum of 4 consecutive days). [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Response as defined by a ≥30% reduction from Baseline in the daily average pain intensity NRS score (sustained for a minimum of 4 consecutive days). [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Vital sign measurements at Screening, Baseline, and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 12, and 16 (or at early termination). [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Time to a ≥50% reduction from Baseline in the daily average pain intensity NRS score (sustained for a minimum of 4 consecutive days). [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Change in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease (Cancer Pain) Activity at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 16. [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Neurologic examination at Screening, Baseline, and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 12, and 16 (or at early termination). [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Total duration of response as defined by days with ≥50% reduction from Baseline in the daily average pain intensity NRS score. [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Change from Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 16, in the modified Brief Pain Inventory (mBPI) average pain scores obtained at study visits. [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Response as defined by a ≥50% reduction from Baseline in the daily average pain intensity NRS score (sustained for a minimum of 4 consecutive days). [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Response as defined by a ≥30% reduction from Baseline in the daily average pain intensity NRS score at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 16. [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Response as defined by a ≥50% reduction from Baseline in the daily average pain intensity NRS score at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 16. [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Total duration of response as defined by days with ≥30% reduction from Baseline in the daily average pain intensity NRS score. [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Anti-Drug Antibody testing at Baseline and Weeks 4, 6, 12 and 16 (or at early termination). [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Adverse events from time of first dose of study treatment through the last patient visit. [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Patient's Global Evaluation of Study Medication at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 16. [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Average daily opioid consumption (up to Week 16). [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • ECG at Baseline (predosing and 1 hr post-dose) and Weeks 4 and 16 (or at early termination). [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Change from Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16 in the daily average pain intensity NRS score. [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Change from Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 16 in the daily worst pain intensity NRS score. [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Change from Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 16, in the mBPI worst pain scores obtained at study visits. [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Change in the weekly Opioid Related Symptom Distress Scale at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 12 and 16. [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Change from Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 16, in the mBPI Pain Interference with Function Composite Score and individual pain interference item scores obtained at study visits. [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Estimated Enrollment:   58
Study Start Date:   October 2008
Estimated Study Completion Date:   July 2010
Estimated Primary Completion Date:   July 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Arms Assigned Interventions
Tanezumab 10 mg IV + opioids: Experimental Drug: Tanezumab 10 mg IV
Single IV infusion of 10 mg tanezumab on Day 1. Maintained on baseline opioid regimen.
Placebo + opioids: Placebo Comparator
Single IV infusion of placebo for tanezumab on Day 1. Maintained on baseline opioid regimen.
Drug: IV Placebo for tanezumab
Single IV infusion of placebo for tanezumab on Day 1. Maintained on baseline opioid regimen.

  Eligibility
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Prostate cancer or breast cancer that has spread to bone, causing moderate to severe bone pain.
  • Requires daily opioid medication

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not have bone pain caused by cancer are not eligible for the study.
  • Patients who started chemotherapy less than 4 weeks ago, or who completed radiotherapy less than 4 weeks ago, are not eligible.
  Contacts and Locations

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00545129

Contacts
Contact: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center     1-800-718-1021    

Locations
United States, Arizona
Pfizer Investigational Site    
      Litchfield Park, Arizona, United States, 85340
Pfizer Investigational Site    
      Sun City, Arizona, United States, 85351
United States, California
Pfizer Investigational Site    
      Antioch, California, United States, 94509
Pfizer Investigational Site    
      Walnut Creek, California, United States, 94598
Pfizer Investigational Site    
      San Leandro, California, United States, 94578
Pfizer Investigational Site    
      Concord, California, United States, 94520
United States, New Jersey
Pfizer Investigational Site    
      Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601
Pfizer Investigational Site    
      Teaneck, New Jersey, United States, 07666
United States, Ohio
Pfizer Investigational Site    
      Middletown, Ohio, United States, 45042
United States, South Carolina
Pfizer Investigational Site    
      Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States, 29572
United States, Texas
Pfizer Investigational Site    
      Beaumont, Texas, United States, 77701
United States, Utah
Pfizer Investigational Site    
      Ogden, Utah, United States, 84403-3274

Sponsors and Collaborators
Pfizer

Investigators
Study Director:     Pfizer CT.gov Call Center     Pfizer    
  More Information


To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.  This link exits the ClinicalTrials.gov site
 

Responsible Party:   Pfizer Inc. ( Director, Clinical Trials Disclosure Group )
Study ID Numbers:   A4091003
First Received:   October 15, 2007
Last Updated:   November 19, 2008
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:   NCT00545129
Health Authority:   United States: Food and Drug Administration

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Neoplasm Metastasis
Pain

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Neoplasms
Neoplastic Processes
Pathologic Processes

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on November 20, 2008




Links to all studies - primarily for crawlers