|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsored by: |
Cleveland Chiropractic College |
|---|---|
| Information provided by: | Cleveland Chiropractic College |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00497861 |
Purpose
This study compared the treatment effect of Activator Methods Chiropractic Technique (AMCT) and manual Diversified type spinal manipulative therapy in a sample of patients with acute and sub-acute low back pain.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Back Pain |
Procedure: Activator Methods Chiropractic Technique |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Uncontrolled, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study |
| Official Title: | Comparison of Mechanical Force, Manually Assisted Activator Manipulation Versus Manual Side Posture Manipulation in Patients With Low Back Pain: a Randomized Pilot Study |
| Enrollment: | 40 |
| Study Start Date: | December 2004 |
| Study Completion Date: | April 2007 |
The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of (MFMA) Activator instrument adjusting to manual side posture (HVL) adjustments in patients with acute low back pain.
Primary outcomes measured include pain measurement with a VAS scale, the use of the Oswestry pain scale questionnaire, and the Bournemouth back pain scale questionnaire.
An additional aim of this study is to evaluate feasibility of recruitment, data collection, and other procedures which can lead to additional studies with larger number of subjects including a control group.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 21 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria consisted of the following:
Subjects with sciatica were excluded if they had any one of the following:
These six neurologic tests allow detection of most clinically significant nerve root compromises resulting from L4-L5 or L5-S1 disc herniations, which together make up more than 90% of all clinically significant radiculopathies attributable to lumbar disc herniations (21-25). Because approximately 12% of ambulatory patients with back pain h
The criteria described above were intended to minimize the likelihood of including subjects with a lumbar disc herniation.
Contacts and Locations| United States, Missouri | |
| Cleveland Chiropractic College | |
| Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64131 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Mark T Pfefer, D.C., R.N. | Cleveland Chiropractic College |
More Information
| Study ID Numbers: | MPMFMA1 |
| Study First Received: | July 5, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | July 6, 2007 |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00497861 History of Changes |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
|
Low back pain Chiropractic Spinal manipulation Activator Methods Chiropractic Technique |
|
Signs and Symptoms Neurologic Manifestations Low Back Pain Pain Back Pain |
|
Signs and Symptoms Nervous System Diseases Neurologic Manifestations |
Low Back Pain Pain Back Pain |