Primary Outcome Measures:
- Change in global quality of life (G-QOL) as measured at baseline and after study completion [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- G-QOL after study completion [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Communication as measured by patients' estimation of physicians' compassion and attribute and physicians' satisfaction with patient-physician communication [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change in symptoms and syndromes as measured by difference in Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale Score, Karnofsky performance status, weight, shortness of breath, nutritional intake, and 3 patient chosen symptoms at baseline and after study completion [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Symptom management performance as measured by number of visits with a symptom load above a defined threshold of 5 symptoms without immediate intervention and number of accompanying persons in weeks 3-6 [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Factors influencing the change in G-QOL (i.e., tumor response [complete and partial response, stable or progressive disease], tumor type, predominant symptom, anxiety, complexity, education, hospitalization) [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change in burden of illness and treatment over time [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Comparison of the number of mismatched decision-making preferences between weeks 3-6 [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Determine the effect of an electronic tool for monitoring symptoms and syndromes associated with advanced cancer (E-MOSAIC) and a Longitudinal Monitoring Sheet (LoMoS) on global quality of life (G-QOL) of patients with advanced incurable cancer receiving palliative anticancer treatment.
Secondary
- Determine if this tool affects communication between these patients and their treating physicians.
- Determine if this tool affects the symptoms and syndromes reported by these patients.
- Determine if this tool impacts symptom management performance.
Tertiary
- Identify factors influencing changes in G-QOL.
- Determine how patients adapt to illness and burden of treatment.
- Describe patients' decision-making preference.
OUTLINE: This is a controlled, randomized, longitudinal, multicenter study. Physicians are stratified according to participating center. Physicians are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. All patients allocated to a physician undergo the same intervention.
- Arm I: Patients complete a weekly symptom assessment and nutritional intake using a Palm-based monitoring tool. Nurses record weight and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scores weekly. A proof of electronic transfer sheet is printed and stored.
- Arm II: Patients complete a weekly assessment comprising visual analogue scales (VAS) of pain, fatigue, drowsiness, nausea, anxiety, depression, shortness of breath, loss of appetite, and overall well-being; up to 3 optional symptoms selected by the patient; and an estimated nutritional intake using an electronic tool for monitoring symptoms and syndromes associated with advanced cancer (E-MOSAIC). Nurses record the patient's weight, KPS score, body mass index, and assessment of current medication for pain (i.e., morphine-equivalent daily dose), fatigue, and anorexia/cachexia syndromes weekly. A Longitudinal Monitoring Sheet (LoMoS) is printed (comprising VAS of pain, pain medication, fatigue, KPS, medication for fatigue [i.e., methylphenidate hydrochloride or epoetin alfa], anorexia, weight change, nutritional intake, medication, supplements, counseling for anorexia, VAS of individually selected symptoms) and stored.
In both arms, patients are assessed for outcome criteria at baseline and at weeks 3 and 6 (end of study).
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 24 physicians and 192 patients will be accrued for this study.