Cediranib (AZD2171, RECENTIN™) in Metastatic or Recurrent Renal Cell Carcinoma
This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
AstraZeneca
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
AstraZeneca
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00423332
First received: January 16, 2007
Last updated: March 1, 2013
Last verified: March 2013
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Cediranib is being tested to assess its effectiveness on the growth of kidney cancer tumours and also how well it is tolerated.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Renal Cell Carcinoma |
Drug: Cediranib Drug: Cediranib Placebo |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Phase II, Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy of Cediranib 45mg Versus Placebo Following 12 Weeks of Treatment in Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Have Had no Previous Anti-VEGF Therapy. |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by AstraZeneca:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Percentage Change From Baseline in Tumour Size at 12 Weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Sum of longest diameters of the target lesions, based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria ((Week 12 - baseline)/baseline)*100
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Best Percentage Change From Baseline in Tumour Size During the Study [ Time Frame: Treatment period up to Week 12 visit date for last patient in (LPI) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Maximum reduction or minimum increase in tumour size where size is the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions
- Duration of Response [ Time Frame: Treatment period up to 2nd data cut-off of 8th March 2009 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Based on RECIST measurements taken throughout the study and best objective tumour response at the defined analysis cut-off point. Measured from the time the criteria for complete response (CR)/partial response (PR) are first met (whichever is recorded first) until the patient progresses or dies.
- Progression Free Survival [ Time Frame: Treatment period up to 2nd data cut-off of 8th March 2009. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Number of months from randomisation until progressive disease based on RECIST (progression of target lesions, clear progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions) or death in the absence of progression.
- Objective Tumour Response at 12 Weeks [ Time Frame: Response rate at 12 weeks was based on RECIST measurements taken at baseline and at Week 12, or upon progression if this was before Week 12. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Number of patients with complete (CR) /partial response (PR) (based on RECIST). CR is defined as Disappearance of all target lesions. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of Longest Diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. At 12 weeks, tumour responses would be unconfirmed, as this was the first post-baseline RECIST assessment, unless a patient had a RECIST assessment before Week 12 to confirm a suspected progression.
- Best Objective Tumour Response [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 and every 8 weeks thereafter or until progression. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Best Objective Tumour response as defined by RECIST. Patients were assigned to 1 of the following best objective tumour response categories: complete response (CR) defined as a Disappearance of all target lesions, partial response (PR), defined as At least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD, stable disease (SD) defined as Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD taking as references the smallest sum LD since the treatment started, or progressive disease (PD) defined as At least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded (either at baseline or at previous assessment since treatment began). Patients who were evaluable for RECIST assessments, but who did not meet the criteria for CR, PR, SD, or PD, were assigned to the response category of not evaluable (NE).
| Enrollment: | 62 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2007 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | June 2013 |
| Primary Completion Date: | March 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: 1
Cediranib placebo
|
Drug: Cediranib Placebo
oral tablet
|
|
Experimental: 2
Cediranib
|
Drug: Cediranib
45 mg oral tablet
Other Names:
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Confirmation of metastatic or recurrent renal cell carcinoma
Exclusion Criteria:
- Certain types of previous anti-cancer therapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Patients with type I insulin-dependent diabetes or poorly-controlled type II insulin-independent diabetes
- Patients with a history of poorly controlled high blood pressure
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00423332
Locations
| Netherlands | |
| Research Site | |
| Amsterdam, Netherlands | |
| Research Site | |
| Groningen, Netherlands | |
| Research Site | |
| Leiden, Netherlands | |
| Research Site | |
| Nijmegen, Netherlands | |
| United Kingdom | |
| Research Site | |
| Northwood, Middlesex, United Kingdom | |
| Research Site | |
| Birmingham, United Kingdom | |
| Research Site | |
| London, United Kingdom | |
| Research Site | |
| Manchester, United Kingdom | |
| Research Site | |
| Oxford, United Kingdom | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
AstraZeneca
Investigators
| Study Director: | Jane Robertson | AstraZeneca |
More Information
No publications provided by AstraZeneca
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | AstraZeneca |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00423332 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | D8480C00030, EudraCT no. 2006-002455-33 |
| Study First Received: | January 16, 2007 |
| Results First Received: | April 3, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | March 1, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United Kingdom: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency Netherlands: The Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO) |
Keywords provided by AstraZeneca:
|
cancer tumour advanced cancer |
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma kidney cancer RECENTIN |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Carcinoma Carcinoma, Renal Cell Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial Neoplasms by Histologic Type Neoplasms Adenocarcinoma |
Kidney Neoplasms Urologic Neoplasms Urogenital Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Kidney Diseases Urologic Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013