Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
A Study To Investigate The Effectiveness Of AH234844 (Lavoltidine) Compared With NEXIUM And Ranitidine.
This study has been completed.
First Received: November 27, 2006   Last Updated: October 15, 2008   History of Changes
Sponsor: GlaxoSmithKline
Information provided by: GlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00405119
  Purpose

Current treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) confirms an unmet need in patients, based on slow onset of action and an inability to provide 24-hour gastric-acid suppression. Clinical data on AH234844 demonstrates a rapid onset of action, high potency, and prolonged duration of effect. The present study endeavors, in part, to compare lavoltidine to two GERD drugs, NEXIUM and ranitidine.


Condition Intervention Phase
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Drug: AH23844 (lavoltidine)
Drug: NEXIUM (esomeprazole)
Drug: ZANTAC (ranitidine)
Phase II

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Diagnostic, Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Assignment, Pharmacokinetics/Dynamics Study
Official Title: See Detailed Description

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by GlaxoSmithKline:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • pH over 24hours [ Time Frame: over 24hours ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • %24 hours pH>4 Median gastric pH Adverse events [ Time Frame: over 24 hours ]

Enrollment: 92
Study Start Date: May 2006
Detailed Description:

A three-part study in healthy male volunteers to determine the most effective of four different lavoltidine doses on gastric pH and to compare the most effective dose with NEXIUM (esomeprazole) 40mg for the inhibition of gastric-acid secretion and with ranitidine (300mg/day) for the amount of pharmacodynamic tolerance

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 55 Years
Genders Eligible for Study:   Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion criteria:

  • Subject must have a Body Mass Index (BMI) from 19-30 kg/m2
  • Subject does not present with abnormal clinical lab findings
  • Subject is able to tolerate a nasogastric pH electrode.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Subject is Helicobacter-positive on a C13 urea breath test
  • Subject has a baseline median 24-hour gastric pH>3
  • For Part B of the study, subjects are CYP 2C19 poor metabolizers.
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00405119

Locations
Australia, New South Wales
GSK Investigational Site
Randwick, New South Wales, Australia, 2031
Australia, Queensland
GSK Investigational Site
Herston, Queensland, Australia, 4006
Sponsors and Collaborators
GlaxoSmithKline
Investigators
Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials GlaxoSmithKline
  More Information

No publications provided

Responsible Party: GSK ( Study Director )
Study ID Numbers: LAV104616
Study First Received: November 27, 2006
Last Updated: October 15, 2008
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00405119     History of Changes
Health Authority: Australia: Department of Health and Ageing Therapeutic Goods Administration

Keywords provided by GlaxoSmithKline:
AH23844
gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
pharmacokinetics
pharmacodynamics
tolerance
ranitidine
esomeprazole

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Neurotransmitter Agents
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Gastrointestinal Diseases
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Gastrointestinal Agents
Histamine Agents
Omeprazole
Enzyme Inhibitors
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Histamine H2 Antagonists
Pharmacologic Actions
Esophageal Motility Disorders
Deglutition Disorders
Ranitidine
Digestive System Diseases
Histamine Antagonists
Ranitidine bismuth citrate
Therapeutic Uses
Anti-Ulcer Agents
Esophageal Diseases
Loxtidine

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on February 04, 2010