Comparison of Dialysis Strategies in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Renal Failure (rescue)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The goal of the present study is the comparison of different dialysis strategies in critically ill patients with acute renal failure on the intensive care unit. Patients are treated with either continuous dialysis or hemofiltration. Outcome measures are death, restitution of renal function, days on ICU, hemodynamic stability, dialysis efficiency.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Dialysis Acute Renal Failure |
Procedure: Renal replacement therapy |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Comparison of Dialysis Strategies in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Renal Failure on the Intensive Care Unit |
- Death [ Time Frame: 90 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- costs [ Time Frame: in hospital ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Restitution of renal function [ Time Frame: 90 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- days on ICU [ Time Frame: in hospital ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- hemodynamic stability [ Time Frame: in hospital ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- dialysis efficiency [ Time Frame: in hospital ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 230 |
| Study Start Date: | April 2006 |
| Study Completion Date: | February 2009 |
| Primary Completion Date: | December 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Active Comparator: SLED |
Procedure: Renal replacement therapy
ICU patients with acute renal failure were prospectively randomized to either CVVHD or SLED
Other Names:
|
| Active Comparator: CVVHD |
Procedure: Renal replacement therapy
ICU patients with acute renal failure were prospectively randomized to either CVVHD or SLED
Other Names:
|
Detailed Description:
The goal of the present study is the comparison of different renal replacement strategies in critically ill patients with acute renal failure on the intensive care unit. In a prospectively randomized clinical study patients are treated with either continuous dialysis (SLED) or continuous hemofiltration (CVVHD). 200 patients should be included in the study (n=100 each). The primary outcome is death at ICU, secondary outcome measures are restitution of renal function, days on ICU, hemodynamic stability, dialysis efficiency.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients 18 years or older
- Written informed consent
- No pre-existing dialysis dependency
Exclusion Criteria:
- Minors / children
- No consent
- Severe electrolyte disturbances which necessitates special dialysis therapy
Contacts and Locations| Germany | |
| Division of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg | |
| Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany, 69120 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Vedat Schwenger, MD | Division of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Vedat Schwenger M.D, Prof. Dr. med., University of Heidelberg |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00322530 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | HD-Dialysis-2006 |
| Study First Received: | May 4, 2006 |
| Last Updated: | August 23, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Critical Illness Acute Kidney Injury Renal Insufficiency Disease Attributes |
Pathologic Processes Kidney Diseases Urologic Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013