|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsored by: |
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio |
|---|---|
| Information provided by: | The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00223379 |
Purpose
This protocol is for a clinical trial evaluating the clinical success of root canal therapy performed on teeth with chronic apical periodontitis of pulpal origin with either large or small apical root canal preparation techniques.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Chronic Apical Periodontitis of Pulpal Origin |
Procedure: Endodontic procedure with varied apical preparation size |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind (Subject), Active Control, Parallel Assignment |
| Official Title: | Longitudinal Endodontic Study of Apical Preparation Size |
| Enrollment: | 36 |
| Study Start Date: | December 2002 |
| Study Completion Date: | December 2007 |
| Primary Completion Date: | December 2007 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
This randomized clinical trial will compare the clinical success of two commonly used techniques for performing non-surgical endodontic procedures on teeth with chronic apical periodontitis of pulpal origin. The first method, termed the "GT method" uses a commercially available rotary file system to instrument the root canal systems from the crown to the apical portion of the root. After completion of this technique, the apical portion of the root is prepared to the same standardized ISO size #20 in all roots (i.e., 0.2 mm cross-sectional diameter). The second method, termed the "Lightspeed method" uses a different commercially available rotary file system to shape the root canal systems from the apical to the crown portion of the root. After completion of this technique, the apical preparation is often larger in cross-sectional diameter than that observed after the GT method; however, an equally important distinction is that the Lightspeed method customizes the final cross-sectional diameter for each root canal system, and thus each root has a similar enlargement of apical preparation size due to proportionate removal of infected dentin at the end of the root.
Although the Lightspeed method may result in reduced bacteria in the apical portion of root canal systems, there is no evidence to date that this effect improves clinical success rates. This study will test the hypothesis that the larger apical preparation size produced by the Lightspeed instrumentation system will produce a higher percentage of clinically successful treatments of teeth with apical periodontitis (AP) as compared to the GT method
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 70 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Contacts and Locations| United States, Texas | |
| The University of Texas Health Science Center | |
| San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229-3900 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Karl Keiser, DDS, MS | The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Texas |
More Information
| Responsible Party: | University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio ( Kenneth Hargreaves, DDS, PhD ) |
| Study ID Numbers: | 012-1904-342 |
| Study First Received: | September 13, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | July 18, 2008 |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00223379 History of Changes |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
|
Apical Periodontitis, Root Canal Therapy, Apical Preparation |
|
Mouth Diseases Periodontal Diseases Periodontitis |
Periapical Diseases Stomatognathic Diseases Periapical Periodontitis |
|
Mouth Diseases Periodontal Diseases Periodontitis Periapical Diseases |
Jaw Diseases Stomatognathic Diseases Periapical Periodontitis |