Study Evaluating Refacto For Pharmacovigilance
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Information provided by:
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00195442
First received: September 13, 2005
Last updated: February 7, 2011
Last verified: February 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of treatment with ReFacto under conditions of routine therapy. Furthermore a continuous benefit/risk assessment will be done.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Hemophilia A |
Drug: Moroctocog alfa |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Prospective |
| Official Title: | Pharmacovigilance Evaluation Of Refacto In Usual Care Settings |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Genetics Home Reference related topics:
hemophilia
MedlinePlus related topics:
Hemophilia
U.S. FDA Resources
Further study details as provided by Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Mean Number of Bleeding Episodes Per Patient Year [ Time Frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Participants with hemophilia A suffer from a hereditary lack of blood clotting factor VIII. As a consequence, the ability of the blood to coagulate is reduced and bleedings at any site or organ of the body may occur after minor injury or even spontaneously. Predominantly, joints, muscles, and internal organs are affected by bleeding complications. Participants reported the occurrence of each bleeding episode while on study. The bleeding rate for each participant was calculated by number of reported episodes per years on study.
- Mean Number of Bleeding-related Exposure Days Per Patient Year [ Time Frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Exposure days are the number of days of treatment with ReFacto.
- Mean Number of Exposure Days Per Patient Year [ Time Frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Exposure days are the number of days of treatment with ReFacto.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Number of Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [ Time Frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]AEs are any undesired side effect which occurred in a participant undergoing study treatment independent of whether a correlation with study treatment was suspected or not. SAEs are undesired events which were lethal or life-threatening, made hospitalization or extension of hospital stay necessary, lead to permanent damage with handicap (inability to work), as well as congenital anomalies, malignant disease, or overdosing. Also presence of inhibitors, thrombotic events, erythrocyte agglutination, allergic reactions, less than therapeutic effect, and inhibitor development were considered SAEs.
- Number of Participants With de Novo Inhibitor Formation [ Time Frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The applied criteria of clinical relevance for de novo inhibitor formation was defined as normal Factor VIII dosage was ineffective to control a bleeding, control of bleeding episodes required increasing Factor VIII dosage, change of concentrate type (administration of activated Prothrombin-Complex Concentrate [aPCC] or recombinant Factor VII [rFVII ]) was needed to stop a bleeding, or change of therapy strategy (intensive prophylaxis or Immune Tolerance Induction [ITI]) was required.
- Mean Annual ReFacto Consumption Per Patient Year [ Time Frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]ReFacto administered as International Units (IU) according to the physician's decision following the drug's summary of product characteristics (SPC) and according to usual care principles.
- Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of Satisfaction With Treatment Success [ Time Frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Subjective assessment by the physician to evaluate treatment success (i.e., control of bleeding, Factor VIII consumption, treatment efficacy and tolerance, handling of preparation, and days missing from work or school). Physician rated assessment could be categorized as Very satisfied, Satisfied, Unsatisfied, or Very unsatisfied; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.
- Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of Efficacy [ Time Frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Subjective assessment by the physician to evaluate control of bleeding. Physician rated assessment could be categorized as Very good, Good, Moderate, or Poor; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.
- Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of Efficacy [ Time Frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Subjective assessment by the participant to evaluate control of bleeding. Patient rated assessment could be categorized as Very good, Good, Moderate, Poor, or No specification; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.
- Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of Tolerance [ Time Frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Subjective assessment by the physician to evaluate the participants' tolerance of treatment with ReFacto (i.e., dose, administration method, or adverse effects). Physician rated assessment could be categorized as Very good, Good, Moderate, or Poor; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.
- Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of Tolerance [ Time Frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Subjective assessment by the participant to evaluate tolerance of treatment with ReFacto (i.e., dose, administration method, or adverse effects). Patient rated assessment could be categorized as Very good, Good, Moderate, Poor, or No specification; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.
- Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of Handling of ReFacto [ Time Frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Subjective assessment by the physician to evaluate the participants' handling (preparation and administration) of ReFacto. Physician rated assessment could be categorized as Very good, Good, Moderate, or Poor; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.
- Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of Handling of ReFacto [ Time Frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Subjective assessment by the participant on handling (preparation and administration) of ReFacto. Patient rated assessment could be categorized as Very good, Good, Moderate, Poor, or No specification; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.
- Number of Participants for Days of Sick Leave Per Month [ Time Frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Days of sick leave (missing work or school) per month categorized as No days of absence, Number of days of absence, Long-term inability to work or study, Not employed or at school, or No specification.
| Enrollment: | 288 |
| Study Start Date: | July 1999 |
| Study Completion Date: | January 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | January 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Groups/Cohorts | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
A
Patients with Hemophilia A
|
Drug: Moroctocog alfa
Patients will be treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of ReFacto (Moroctocog alfa) in Germany. The dosage and duration of therapy is to be determined by the physician to meet the patients' individual needs for treatment.
Other Name: ReFacto
|
Detailed Description:
Non-interventional study: subjects to be selected according to the usual clinical practice of their physician
Eligibility| Genders Eligible for Study: | Male |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
Study Population
Patients with hemophilia A
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Proven diagnosis of Hemophilia A
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contraindications according to Summary of Product Characteristics
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00195442
Locations
| Austria | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Vienna, Austria, A-1090 | |
| Germany | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany, 60596 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Giessen, Hessen, Germany, 35385 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany, 18055 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany, 30625 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 53105 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Halle, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany, 06120 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Stadtroda, Thuringen, Germany, 07646 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Berlin, Germany, 10249 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Berlin, Germany, 13353 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Bermen, Germany, 28205 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Erlangen, Germany, 91054 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Frankfurt a. M., Germany, 60594 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Hamburg, Germany, 20246 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Heidelberg, Germany, 69123 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Homburg, Germany, 66424 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Klipphausen, Germany, 01665 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Leipzig, Germany, 04103 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Lubeck, Germany, 23538 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Muenchen, Germany, 80337 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Muenchen, Germany, 80336 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Muenster, Germany, D-48143 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Potsdam, Germany, 14467 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Schwerin, Germany, 19049 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Ulm, Germany, 89081 | |
| Pfizer Investigational Site | |
| Wiesbaden, Germany, 65191 | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Investigators
| Study Director: | Pfizer CT.gov Call Center | Pfizer |
More Information
Additional Information:
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Director, Clinical Trial Disclosure Group, Pfizer, Inc |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00195442 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 3082A-100690 |
| Study First Received: | September 13, 2005 |
| Results First Received: | January 12, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | February 7, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Paul-Ehrlich-Institut |
Keywords provided by Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer:
|
Hemophilia A |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Hemophilia A Blood Coagulation Disorders, Inherited Blood Coagulation Disorders Hematologic Diseases Coagulation Protein Disorders Hemorrhagic Disorders |
Genetic Diseases, Inborn Factor VIII Coagulants Hematologic Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 17, 2013