Utility of FDG-PET Scan on the Selection of Patients for Resection of Hepatic Colorectal Metastases
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Radboud University
Collaborators:
VU University Medical Center
University Medical Centre Groningen
MMC Hopsital Veldvoven (Department of Surgery)
Information provided by:
Radboud University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00119899
First received: July 6, 2005
Last updated: August 30, 2005
Last verified: August 2005
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Objective(s) of the proposed study:
- The evaluation of the efficiency of 18F deoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) in staging patients eligible for hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases in a randomized clinical multicentre setting.
Research questions of the proposed study:
- What are the effects and costs for patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer indicated for potentially curative hepatic resection, using the conventional diagnostic strategy with computed tomography (CT) scan in comparison to the experimental diagnostic strategy incorporating FDG-PET scan (CT + FDG-PET scan), based on a health care perspective and a time horizon of 9 months.
More specifically:
- Does the experimental diagnostic strategy which includes FDG-PET scan in the diagnostic work-up of patients eligible for potentially curative hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases lead to a better disease-free survival at 9 months after hepatic resection in comparison to the conventional diagnostic strategy using CT scan without FDG-PET scan.
- What are the costs of diagnostic and therapeutic care for the two diagnostic strategies for patients eligible for potentially curative hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases.
- What is the effect of including the FDG-PET scan in the diagnostic work-up of patients eligible for potentially curative hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases after hepatic resection, expressed as disease-free survival at 9 months adjusted for quality of health (Q-TWIST), in comparison to the use of CT scan only.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Colorectal Liver Metastases Colorectal Cancer Neoplasm Metastasis |
Procedure: FDG-PET scan |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Diagnostic |
| Official Title: | Utility of FDG-PET Scan on the Selection of Patients for Resection of Hepatic Colorectal Metastases |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Radboud University:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Disease Free Survival (9 months)
- Economic evaluation (9 months)
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Disease Free Survival
- Overall Survival
- Change in Clinical Management
- Economic evaluation
| Estimated Enrollment: | 150 |
| Study Start Date: | March 2002 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | June 2005 |
Show Detailed Description
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- One to four colorectal liver metastases on spiral CT, judged potentially resectable by an experienced liver surgeon from the institution participating in the trial.
- WHO performance status 0, 1 or 2.
- Age 18-75 years
- Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- Evidence of extrahepatic disease as demonstrated by spiral CT scan of chest and abdomen with oral and intravenous contrast with contiguous reconstruction algorithm. In case of previous rectal cancer spiral CT should include the pelvic area. CT readings should be performed by an experienced radiologist from the institution participating in the trial.
- Signs of recurrent or second colorectal carcinoma on barium enema or colonoscopy.
- Any other previous malignancy other than adequately treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix or non-melanoma skin cancer (unless there has been a disease-free interval of at least 10 years).
- Major hepatic insufficiency.
- Active infection and diabetes mellitus
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00119899
Locations
| Netherlands | |
| MMC | |
| Veldhoven, Brabant, Netherlands | |
| UMC ST Radboud | |
| Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6500 HB | |
| UMCVU | |
| Amsterdam, Noord Holland, Netherlands | |
| UMCG | |
| Groningen, Netherlands | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
Radboud University
VU University Medical Center
University Medical Centre Groningen
MMC Hopsital Veldvoven (Department of Surgery)
Investigators
| Principal Investigator: | Wim JG Oyen, MD, Phd | Radboud University |
More Information
No publications provided
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00119899 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | POLEM (ZonMW DO 945-11017), (ZonMW DO 945-11017) |
| Study First Received: | July 6, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | August 30, 2005 |
| Health Authority: | Netherlands: The Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO) |
Keywords provided by Radboud University:
|
Colorectal Cancer; Liver; Metastases; Resection; |
Fluorodeoxyglucose; Tomography; Positron-Emission |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Neoplasms Colorectal Neoplasms Neoplasm Metastasis Neoplasms, Second Primary Liver Neoplasms Intestinal Neoplasms Gastrointestinal Neoplasms Digestive System Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site |
Digestive System Diseases Gastrointestinal Diseases Colonic Diseases Intestinal Diseases Rectal Diseases Neoplastic Processes Pathologic Processes Liver Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013