Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Nerve Grafting Followed by Standard Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction in Treating Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
RATIONALE: Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with nerve grafting followed by standard therapies for erectile dysfunction may be effective in helping patients with prostate cancer improve sexual satisfaction and quality of life. It is not yet known whether erectile dysfunction therapy and nerve-sparing prostatectomy are more effective with or without nerve grafting.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying nerve grafting and standard therapy to see how well they work compared to standard therapy alone in treating erectile dysfunction in patients undergoing nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Prostate Cancer |
Drug: Alprostadil (E1) Drug: Papaverine Drug: Phentolamine mesylate Drug: Sildenafil citrate Procedure: conventional surgery |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Supportive Care |
| Official Title: | A Randomized Phase II Trial Evaluating the Importance of Early Erectile Dysfunction Rehabilitation and Unilateral Autologous Sural Nerve Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer |
- Potency rate at 2 years after surgery [ Time Frame: 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 111 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2001 |
| Study Completion Date: | July 2009 |
| Primary Completion Date: | July 2006 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Arm I
Patients undergo unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with unilateral autologous interposition sural nerve grafting.
|
Drug: Alprostadil (E1)
Beginning 6 weeks after surgery, intracavernous Triplemix (prostaglandin E1, papaverine, and phentolamine) injected twice weekly
Other Names:
Drug: Papaverine
Beginning 6 weeks after surgery, intracavernous Triplemix (prostaglandin E1, papaverine, and phentolamine) injected twice weekly
Other Names:
Drug: Phentolamine mesylate
Beginning 6 weeks after surgery, intracavernous Triplemix (prostaglandin E1, papaverine, and phentolamine) injected twice weekly
Drug: Sildenafil citrate
Oral sildenafil as needed
Other Name: Viagra
Procedure: conventional surgery
Unilateral cavernous nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy
Other Name: prostatectomy
|
|
Active Comparator: Arm II (No sural nerve grafting)
Patients undergo unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (without sural nerve grafting) and erectile dysfunction rehabilitation as in arm I.
|
Drug: Alprostadil (E1)
Beginning 6 weeks after surgery, intracavernous Triplemix (prostaglandin E1, papaverine, and phentolamine) injected twice weekly
Other Names:
Drug: Papaverine
Beginning 6 weeks after surgery, intracavernous Triplemix (prostaglandin E1, papaverine, and phentolamine) injected twice weekly
Other Names:
Drug: Phentolamine mesylate
Beginning 6 weeks after surgery, intracavernous Triplemix (prostaglandin E1, papaverine, and phentolamine) injected twice weekly
Drug: Sildenafil citrate
Oral sildenafil as needed
Other Name: Viagra
Procedure: conventional surgery
Unilateral cavernous nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy
Other Name: prostatectomy
|
Detailed Description:
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the efficacy of erectile dysfunction rehabilitation and unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with versus without unilateral autologous interposition sural nerve grafting in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
- Compare potency rates in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare erection quality in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare time to return of spontaneous erectile activity in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the feasibility of these regimens in these patients.
- Compare quality of life and sexual satisfaction in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare changes in penile erectile length and circumference in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the relative morbidity of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open-label study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients undergo unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with unilateral autologous interposition sural nerve grafting.
Beginning 6 weeks after surgery, patients undergo erectile dysfunction rehabilitation comprising any of the following: oral sildenafil (as occasion requires), use of vacuum erection device over 10 minutes once daily, intracavernous Triplemix (prostaglandin E1, papaverine, and phentolamine) injected twice weekly, or MUSE (suppository in urethra for erections) therapy. Erectile dysfunction rehabilitation may continue for up to 2 years or until return of adequate spontaneous erectile activity.
- Arm II: Patients undergo unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (without sural nerve grafting) and erectile dysfunction rehabilitation as in arm I.
In both arms, treatment continues in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life and sexual history are assessed at baseline, at 6 weeks postoperatively, at 4, 8, 12, and 16 months, and then every 4 months for 2 years or until return of spontaneous erectile activity.
Patients are followed every 4 months for 2 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 200 patients (120 for arm I and 80 for arm II) will be accrued for this study.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | up to 65 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Male |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient must be a candidate for a unilateral nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. a) Gleason score 7 or less in the cores on the side to be spared
- Patient must have no discernable preoperative erectile dysfunction, defined as the ability to have successful penetration on at least 75% of attempts.
- Patient must be </= 65 years of age at the time of study enrollment.
- Patient must have no peripheral neuropathy precluding procurement of a sural nerve graft
- Patient must have no significant psychiatric illness or demonstrable vasculogenic source of impotence.
- No prior history of pelvic irradiation or androgen deprivation therapy (LHRH agonists or anti-androgens)
Exclusion Criteria:
Contacts and Locations| United States, Texas | |
| M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at University of Texas | |
| Houston, Texas, United States, 77030-4009 | |
| Study Chair: | Christopher G. Wood, MD | M.D. Anderson Cancer Center |
More Information
Additional Information:
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | M.D. Anderson Cancer Center |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00080808 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | ID01-304, P50CA090270, P30CA016672, MDA-ID-01304, CDR0000355366 |
| Study First Received: | April 7, 2004 |
| Last Updated: | July 27, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center:
|
perioperative/postoperative complications sexual dysfunction and infertility sexuality and reproductive issues adenocarcinoma of the prostate stage I prostate cancer stage II prostate cancer |
prostaglandin E1 papaverine phentolamine Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy nerve grafting |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Prostatic Neoplasms Erectile Dysfunction Genital Neoplasms, Male Urogenital Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Neoplasms Genital Diseases, Male Prostatic Diseases Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological Sexual and Gender Disorders Mental Disorders Alprostadil Sildenafil Papaverine |
Phentolamine Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors Hematologic Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Vasodilator Agents Cardiovascular Agents Fibrinolytic Agents Fibrin Modulating Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors Enzyme Inhibitors Antihypertensive Agents Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists Adrenergic Antagonists |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013