|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsor: | Department of Veterans Affairs |
|---|---|
| Collaborator: |
None other than DVA HSR&D |
| Information provided by: | Department of Veterans Affairs |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00013234 |
Purpose
We have previously shown (IIR 95-045) that teledermatology, using store and forward technology, can result in reliable and accurate diagnostic outcomes when compared to clinic-based dermatology consultations. This investigation builds on that fundamental diagnostic information by assessing the health services implications of a teledermatology consult system.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Teledermatology |
Procedure: Teledermatology |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Diagnostic, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Single Group Assignment, Efficacy Study |
| Official Title: | Health Services Implications of a Teledermatology Consult System |
| Estimated Enrollment: | 260 |
| Study Completion Date: | September 2003 |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| 1 | Procedure: Teledermatology |
Background:
We have previously shown (IIR 95-045) that teledermatology, using store and forward technology, can result in reliable and accurate diagnostic outcomes when compared to clinic-based dermatology consultations. This investigation builds on that fundamental diagnostic information by assessing the health services implications of a teledermatology consult system.
Objectives:
To investigate health services outcomes related to teledermatology implementation. Outcomes of interest were time to diagnosis and treatment initiation, the proportion of patients that avoided the need for a clinic-based encounter, and an economic analysis.
Methods:
Patients referred from the primary care clinics to the dermatology consult service were randomized to either usual care or a teledermatology consultation. A usual care consultation consisted a conventional text-based electronic consult request. A teledermatology consultation included digital images and a standardized history, in addition to the electronic text-based consult. Consultant dermatologists, reviewing the consult requests for both modalities, decided when, and if, a referral required a clinic-based evaluation.
Status:
Final report has been prepared and is in the review process at this time.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients referred to Dermatology Consult Service.
Exclusion Criteria:
Contacts and Locations| United States, Missouri | |
| Harry S. Truman Memorial VA Medical Center | |
| Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65201-5297 | |
| United States, North Carolina | |
| VA Medical Center | |
| Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705 | |
| Principal Investigator: | John D. Whited, MD MHS | Harry S. Truman Memorial VA Medical Center |
More Information
| Responsible Party: | Department of Veterans Affairs ( Whited, John - Principal Investigator ) |
| Study ID Numbers: | IIR 98-159 |
| Study First Received: | March 14, 2001 |
| Last Updated: | August 6, 2009 |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00013234 History of Changes |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |